OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ANGUL
PRESENT:- SRI DURGA CHARAN MISHRA.
PRESIDENT
A N D
Smt.Sunanda Mallick &Sri K.K.Mohanty,
MEMBERS .
Consumer Complaint No. 66 of 2016
Date of Filling : -04.11.2016.
Date of Order :- 25 .07.2018.
M/S.Chandan Kumar Satpathy,S/O.Basanta Ku,
Satpathy,At- Remuna Talcher,Pin-759100.
_________________________Complainant.
Vrs.
01.Mr.Niranjan,Proprietor Itech System,At-
Dera,Talcher,Near Post Office Square,
Pin- 759103.
02. Hewlett-Packard India Sales Pvt.Ltd,24,
Salapuria Arena Building,Adugodi,House
Main Road,City,Bangalore,State-Karnataka,
Zip- 560030.
03.Sysnet Global Technologiest Pvt.Ltd.,
Plot- 507,1st Floor,Land Mark-in front of
SBI Sahee Nagar Branch,Bhubaneswar-751010.
For the complainant :- Self.
For the opp.party No.1:- Self.
For the opp.party No.2:- Sri S..K.Mohanty & associates (Advs).
For the opp.party No.3:- None.
: J U D G E M E N T :
Smt.S.Mallick,Member.
The grievance of the complainant is deficiency in service by the opp.parties in the present case.
2. The case in brief is that- the complainant had purchased a HP Laptop ,Model No. HP15- R007TX, serial NO.CND4291CFH, manufactured by opp.party No.2 from opp.party No.1, i.e Niranjana Sahoo, Proprietor of ITECH SYSTEMS,DERA,TALCHER for a consideration of Rs.39,523.81 .The laptop was enrolled for 3 years accidental damage protection plan of opp.party No.2 on payment of Rs. 3,999.00. Opp.party No.2 is the manufacturer, while opp.party No.3 is the service provider. It is orally submitted that, after 2 years i.e on dt. 23.8.2016 the laptop was accidentally slipped from his lap while taking a glass of milk from his mother and broken for which the complainant duly informed the matter to the opp.party No.1 & 2. In due course the opp.party No.3 sent an Engineer who took the snaps of the parts of laptop and assured the complainant to settle the matter within 2-3 days but after a month receiving no reply from the opp.parties he sent a mail on 18.10.2016 to the opp.party No.2 . Inspite of several approaches made by the complainant, he could not get the proper service from the opp.parties. Hence the complainant has approached this forum with a prayer to direct the opp.parties to replace the damage parts or to refund the price of the laptop and to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000.00 apart from litigation expenses worth Rs. 10,000.00.
3. The opp.party No.1 & 2 appeared and filed written version. Opp.party No.3 did not appear despite service of notice on him and accordingly, he was set exparte.
4. Opp.party No. 1 admitted the fact of purchase of the laptop by the complainant from him and the complainant had also received the extended warranty by paying the extra money to opp.party No.2.He again pleaded that as per terms and condition of warranty, the necessary service shall have to provided by the opp.party No.2 & 3.
5. Opp.party No.2 in respect to the notice, issued from this forum in this case, appeared and contested the case by filing written version. Sale of the lap top to the complainant with the 3years accidental damage protection on dt. 25.08.2014 is not denied.
6. From the aforesaid pleading of the parties the following issues are settled for determination of the case.
- Whether the complainant is a consumer under the opp.parties ?
- Whether there is deficiency in service by the opp.parties by not providing due service to the complainant ?
- Whether the complainant is entitled to the reliefs claimed ?
: F I N D I N G S :
Isse No.(i):- The complainant has furnished the documents relating to the purchase of the laptop in question from the opp.party No.1. The written version of opp.party No. 1 reveals that, the opp.party No. 2 is the manufacturer & opp.party No.3 is the service provider. The complainant furnished the warranty card, purchase memo of laptop. Since the complainant has purchased the laptop under valid cash memo and opp.party No.2 & 3 are manufacturer and service providers, the complainant is a consumer. So there cannot be second thought that the complainant is not a consumer.
Issue No.(ii):- The complaint petition reveals that, soon after the incident occurred , the complainant had contacted the opp.parties. The laptop was accidentally broken due to an unavoidable situation .
Issue No.(iii):- For the reasons stated in respect of issue No. (i),(ii) & (iii) this forum feel it prudent to pass an order, making the opp.parties liable for the reliefs claimed by the complainant.
: O R D E R :
It isfurtherclarifiedthatin caseofanydeviationofthisorder, the opp.parties shall pay 12% yearlycompoundableinterest on theirrespectiveliability tillactual paymentis made besides other penalty prescribed in the Act.
Order delivered in the open forum
today the 25th July,2018with hand
and seal of this Forum.
Typed to my dictation
and corrected by me Sd/-
(Sri D. C. Mishra)
Sd/- President.
(Smt.S.Mallick)
Member.
Sd/-
(Sri K.K.Mohanty),
-