Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

RP/3/2020

Mr. S.Vijayan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. N.Sivanandam, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.K.Varadhan

10 Feb 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

R.P. No.03/2020

(Against the Order dt.05.08.2019 made in CMP No.56/2019 in C.C. No.03/2019  on the file of D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

                         DATED THE 10^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

 

 

Mr. S. Vijayan,

S/o. Mr. G. Sambandan,

No.84 B, Kamaraj Street,

(Opp. ANM G.G. Hr. Sec. School),

Kancheepuram Town.                      .. Revision Petitioner / Respondent / Opposite party.

 

1-Versus-

Mr. N. Sivanandam,

S/o. Mr. Neelakanda Iyer,

No.60, Madam Street,

Kancheepuram – 631 501.                 .. Revision Respondent / Petitioner / Complainant.

 

 Counsel for the Revision Petitioner / Respondent

 / Opposite party                                                          : M/s. K. Varathan

Counsel for the Revision Respondent / Petitioner

/ Complainant                                                              : M/s. S. Mala Jayanthi

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 10.02.2022 for steps to bring the Legal Heirs of the Revision Respondent / Petitioner / Complainant  and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties. This Revision Petition is posted today for appearance of the Revision Petitioner/ Respondent/Opposite party and for taking steps to bring the Legal Heirs of Revision Respondent/Petitioner/Complainant or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 11.05 A.M., the Revision Petitioner/ Respondent/Opposite party was not present.  Hence, passed over and  called again at 11.50 A.M., then also, the Revision Petitioner/ Respondent/Opposite party has not appeared.  Hence keeping the Revision Petition  pending is of no use as the Revision Petitioner/ Respondent/Opposite party is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the Revision Petition is dismissed for default.  No order as to costs.

 

 

               

                   Sd/-                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

           MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT