Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/456/08

MS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR. L. SRINIVAS - Opp.Party(s)

MS T.K. SREEDHAR

17 Jan 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/456/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. MS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
UPSTAIRS, ANDHRA BANK, POST BOX NO.774, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR. L. SRINIVAS
R/O KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.456 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C.No.214 OF 2007 DISTRICT FORUM-II, KRISHNA ATVIJAYAWADA

Between:

The Branch Manager,
United India Insurance Co., Ltd.,
Upstairs, Andhra Bank, Post Box No.774
Patamata,Vijayawada

                                                       

A N D

 

L.Srinivas S/o Apparao
R/o Krishna Lanka,Vijayawada

 

                                                                                                              

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondent         

 

       

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

.

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY,

TWO THOUSAND ELEVAN

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                       1.    

2.    The factual matrix leading to filing of the appeal and as setout in the complaint is that the complainant insured his Opel Astra Car bearing No.AP 36K 999 with the opposite party for the period   `100/- against the erring driver of the vehicle under MV Act.  `5,92,387/-.  Vijayawada Vijayawada  `5,92,387/- with interest.  

3.     The complainant did not intimate about the accident to the opposite party and the opposite party neither appointed any official valuer nor the motor vehicle inspector the inspected the vehicle.  Vijayawada.  

4.      

5.     `5,01,502/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum along with costs of `5,000/-.

6.    

7.    

1)               Whether the complaint was filed within the period of limitation?

2)               Whether there was any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party?

3)               To what relief?

8.                   `5,92,387/- besides damages of `50,000/-.

9.     

“Notice shall be given in writing to the company immediately upon the occurrence of any accident, loss or damage in the event of any claim and thereafter the insured shall give on such information and assistance as the company shall require. Every letter, claim, writ, summons and/or process or copy thereof shall be forwarded to the company immediately on receipt by the insured.  

 

10.      

11.     12.     

13.      

14.       `5,01,502/-. 

15.     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   KMK*

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.