Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/307/2022

M/s. Kalanjiam Hardwares, Rept. By its Partner Mr. Mohsin, Parrys, Chennai-600 001. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. K. Selva Kumar K.S. Kumar, S/o Kanakasabai, Adayalampet, Maduravoyal, Chennai-600 095. And anot - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. N. Manikandan

29 Sep 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                  BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                       Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 307/2022

                                                   (Against the order in C.C. No.55/2019, dated  14.10.2019, on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Chennai (North))

 

                                                               DATED THIS THE 29^th  DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

 

M/s Kalanjiam Hardwares,

Reptd by its Partner Mr. Mohsin,

No.28, Old No. 33, Devaraja Mudali street,

Parrys, Chennai 600 001                                    ..Appellant/1^st opposite party

 

                                             Vs

 

Mr. K.Selvakumar @ K.S.Kumar,

S/o Kanakasabai, No.207-B, 7^th Street,

Millennium Town, Adayalampet,

Maduravoyal, Chennai 600 095                          ..Respondent 1/complainant

 

M/s Cata Electrodomestics India (P) Ltd,

By its Managing Director, B-15, Freedom

Fighters Enclave, IGNOU Road,

New Delhi – 110 068                                         ..Respondent 2/2^nd opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant/1^st opposite party           : M/s N.Manikandan

Counsel for the Respondent 1/complainant            : M/s P.Sathish

Counsel for the Respondent 2/2^nd opposite party    : M/s Praveena

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                              Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondents 1 and 2 present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and R2 and for arguments in list or for dismissal. Today when the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

       Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                  

      MEMBER                                                                                                  PRESIDENT