West Bengal

Howrah

MA/21/2024

Pappu Singh, - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR. INDRANATH MUKHERJEE, - Opp.Party(s)

Deasini Mukherjee

05 Dec 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/21/2024
( Date of Filing : 29 Feb 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/30/2021
 
1. Pappu Singh,
son of late Ramnarayan Singh residing 365, Belilious Road, P.O. Howrah, P.S. Howrah, Howrah 711 101
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR. INDRANATH MUKHERJEE,
son of late Pravat Mukherjee residing at 1, Belilious Road, P.O. Howrah P.S. Howrah, Howrah 711101
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Dec 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No:  4                                                                                       Date:05/12/2024

Today is fixed for hearing of this M.A. case which has been filed by O.p. for conducting Local Inspection Commission over the suit property through LBS. This matter has been contested by the O.p. by filing W/O.

Heard both sides. Considered submission.

Perused the M.A. application and W/O.

It appears that the O.p. has already handed over possession of the flat measuring about 335 sq.ft but the two shop rooms measuring about 100 sq.ft each have not been delivered to the O.p. who is the complainant of the Complaint case No.30/2021 as yet.

As per case of the applicant side there is a mutual Agreement and according to the mutual Agreement the O.p./complainant has surrendered their claim of shop rooms at the ground floor instead of taking flat of 535 sq.ft. According to the case of the applicant in order to prove this matter they are seeking Local Inspection over the suit property. The point of contention of the applicant side is clearly reflecting that they are trying to fish out evidence by conducting the Local Inspection Commission which is not permissible in the eye of law.

Thus, the prayer for Local Inspection of the applicant side is rejected on contest.

In the result, this M.A. case is disposed of. No order is passed as to cost. 

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.