West Bengal

StateCommission

RC/67/2010

M/S Sukalyani CIL Woman Welfare Organization. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Debasish Mandal. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Tapas Chakroborty.

25 Nov 2010

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
BHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),
31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027
 
RP No. 67 Of 2010
(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/03/2010 in Case No. 159/06 of District None)
 
1. M/S Sukalyani CIL Woman Welfare Organization.
CE 178, Salt Lake North, Police Station-Bidhannagar(N), Kolkata-700064.
2. Dr. (Mrs.) Reba Roy, President,
CE 178, Salt Lake North, Police Station-Bidhannagar(N), Kolkata-700064.
3. Mrs. Bharati Mukherjee, Secretary,
CE 178, Salt Lake North, Police Station-Bidhannagar(N), Kolkata-700064.
4. Mrs. Sushmita Sengupta, Treasurer,
CE 178, Salt Lake North, Police Station-Bidhannagar(N), Kolkata-700064.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Mr. Debasish Mandal.
S/O Sri Bhupendra Nath Mandal,Sukalyani Apartment, Flat No.N/2,5A Nirodh Behari Mallick Road, Police Station-Manicktola, Kolkata-700006(formerly 5A & 5B Nirodh Behari Mallick Road and 2A, Khasmahal Street, Police Station-Manicktola, Kolkata-700006).
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER Member
 HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI Member
 
For the Petitioner:Mr. Tapas Chakroborty., Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Debasish Chatterjee., Advocate
ORDER

ORDER NO. 4 DT. 25.11.10

 

HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. P.K.SAMANTA, PRESIDENT 

Revisionist through Mr. Tapas Chakraborty, Ld. Advocate, and OP through Mr. Debasis Chatterjee, Ld. Advocate, are present.  Heard them in full.  Order is passed as under :-

Upon hearing the Ld. Advocates for the parties and consideration of the impugned order we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction for the following reasons :-

a)  The original agreement as entered into by and between the parties is yet to be produced in the proceeding before the Forum below.  In the absence of the original agreement impounding of the same upon payment of proper and adequate stamp duty is not possible.

b)  The execution and the terms and conditions as stipulated in the agreement have not been disputed by either of the parties to the proceeding.

Therefore, the question of admissibility of the said agreement as a piece of evidence does not arise at this stage.  However, it is observed that upon production of the aforesaid original agreement in the proceeding before the Forum below if for any other reason the question, if any, arises for impounding the same, then the same may be decided afresh in accordance with law.  With this observation the Revisional Application shall stand disposed of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.