Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/848/08

DR. K. SIVARAMAKRISHNAIAH - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR. DASARI VENKATA JAYA HARI RAO - Opp.Party(s)

M/S G. NARASIMHA RAO

09 Feb 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/848/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. DR. K. SIVARAMAKRISHNAIAH
R/O RAJAGOPALAVARI STREET, NEAR KAMMA HOSTEL, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-2.
VIJAYAWADA
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR. DASARI VENKATA JAYA HARI RAO
C/O R.KARUNA SAGAR, S-6, RELIANCE APTS, MASEED STREET, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA-10.
VIJAYAWADA
Andhra Pradesh
2. THE SECRETARY
PROFESSIONAL AND WELFARE SCHEME, IMA, A.P.STATE, II FLOOR, IMA BUILDING, ESAMIA BAZAR, HYD.
HYDERABAD
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.848 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C.No.142 OF 2006 DISTRICT FORUM-IIVIJAYAWADA

 

Between:

Dr.K.Sivaramakrishnaiah, M.S.Opth.
S/o Kotiratnam, aged 70 years
Occ: Optholmologist,Prakasam Road
Governerpet, Vijayawada-002

                                       

A N D

1.         Maseed Street
    

                                                       2.         Hyderabad

                                                                  

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Counsel for the Respondent No.2  

 

QUORUM:  

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

WEDNESDAY THE NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                       1.    

2.     Hyderabad. Hyderabad    `50,000/-.   `1,00,000/-`1,00,000/- towards mental agony and costs.

3.      prescribed medicine.             The complaint has to be decided in civil court.   

4.         5.     

6.     

7.    

8.    

1)               Whether the opposite party no.1 had rendered negligent treatment to the complainant?

2)               To what relief?

9.              

10.              

10.       All these facts would indicate negligence on the part of the opposite party no.1. `50,000/- is on the higher side and we reduce the same to`25,000/-.  `25,000/- to the complainant.

11.    `50,000/- to`25,000/-. `25,000/- together with cots of`2,000/- to the complainant. `2,000/-. 

       

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

KMK*

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.