BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD
F.A.No.962 OF 2008 AGAINST C.D.No.207 OF 2002 DISTRICT FORUM KAKINDADA
Between:
M/s Navya Chaitanya Housing
rep. by its Managing Partner G.Giridhar
Near DCC Bank Ltd., Upstairs of Kokila Restaurant
Kakinada East Godavari Dist.
A N D
1.
2.
3. India
Counsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondents Counsel for the Respondent No.3
QUORUM:
AND
SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER
WEDNESDAY THE NINETH DAY OF MARCH
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)
1.
2. `97,500/- each in instalments by 20.9.2001. The opposite party no.1 assured the complainants to provide a site of 250 sq.yards near Atehampet Junction nearADB Road Kakinada.
3.
4. Kakinada
5.
6. `25,000/- to each complainants together with interest. `97,500/- to each complainant together with interest.
7.
8. `50,000/- and interest @ 9% per annum as awarded by the District Forum in favour of the respondents no.1 and 2?
9.
10. The appellant had pleaded that they had applied for approved layout to the department concerned and after obtaining the approved layout they are ready execute the sale deed in favour of the respondents.
11.
12. `97,500/- from each of them. `97,500/- from each of the respondents without even applying for the sanctioned plan and did not bother to inform the respondents about the state of affairs insofar as the approved layout of the plot is concerned.
13. `50,000/- was awarded, there is no justification in awarding the interest @ 9% per annum.
14.
KMK*
