West Bengal

StateCommission

A/1203/2015

HSBC Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr. Animesh De - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Prasanta Banerjee

21 Jan 2020

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/1203/2015
( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2015 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/09/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/108/2015 of District Kolkata-II(Central))
 
1. HSBC Ltd
Hongkong House, 31, B.B.D. Bagh, Kolkata - 700 001.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Mr. Animesh De
S/o, Sri Manasa Pada De, 77, Netaji Colony, Ist Floor, P.S - Baranagar, Kolkata - 700 090.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Prasanta Banerjee, Advocate
For the Respondent:
Dated : 21 Jan 2020
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

Calling in question the legality of the Order dated 03-09-2015, passed by the Ld. District Forum, Kolkata-II (Central) in CC/108/2015, this Appeal is preferred u/s 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by HSBC Ltd.

The bone of contention between the parties is a Home Loan taken by the Respondent from the Appellant.

I heard both sides in the matter and gone through the documents on record.

The grievance of the Respondent against the Appellant was that the latter realized excess interest and other charges from him at the time of settlement/foreclosure of the said loan account. In support of his contention, the Respondent filed one Statement of Account purportedly prepared by J.C.Chakravarti & Co., Chartered Accountants dated 23-06-2014.

However, the Appellant strongly disputed the validity of the said report stating that once the Respondent voluntarily repaid/foreclosed the concerned loan account, he had no legal right to rake up the issue afresh on the strength of the aforesaid Statement of Account. 

On due consideration of the same, however, I cannot endorse the aforesaid view of the Appellant.  There can be no manner of doubt that calculation of bank interest is indeed a complex procedure and without having proper expertise, it is quite tough for a layman to understand the complexities involved in the matter. If any discrepancy is indeed detected subsequently, in my considered opinion, the aggrieved party reserves every right to realize the excess amount from the bank. 

However, it appears that the authenticity of the said Statement of Account was not established following due process of law.  In view of the objection raised from the side of the Appellant regarding the acceptability of the report prepared by J.C.Chakravarti & Co., Chartered Accountants, I deem it appropriate to direct the Respondent to approach the Ld. District Forum for appointment of an independent Chartered Account (CA) to find out as to whether or not any excess amount was realized by the Appellant, as alleged.  The Appellant shall render all sorts of co-operation to the said independent CA by furnishing relevant circulars and other documents as would be required for evaluation purpose.

Accordingly, the case is remitted back to the Forum below for fresh adjudication of the case on the basis of the report of the independent CA. 

I hereby set aside the impugned order.  Consequent thereof, the Appeal stands allowed in part.  Parties to appear before the Ld. District Forum on 24-02-2020.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.