05.08.2023:

01.   Learned counsel for Review Application submits that, Commission in Appeal No.1942/2017 while allowing the complaint in part directed opposite party Nos.1 & 2 to pay Rs.60,000/- towards compensation for rendering deficiency of service and to pay an amount of Rs.6,000/- towards litigation expenses within 60 days.  Further ordered since an amount of Rs.1,70,760/- is already paid by opposite party No.2 in favour of opposite party No.1 towards the loan account of complainant is maintained.

02.   We examined the impugned order and found certain clerical error in the impugned order in mentioning the amount of Rs.1,20,760/- mentioned as Rs.1,70,760/- and while directing opposite party No.2 to pay Rs.60,000/- towards compensation for rendering deficiency of service and to pay an amount of Rs.6,000/- towards litigation expenses within 60 days.  Opposite party No.1 the RA petitioner herein is also mentioned which is a typographical error is hereby corrected in exercising the powers under section 50 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.  Accordingly the issuance of notice of RA is not necessary to be served on respondents.  RA stands disposed-off.  The office is directed to the order is hereby reviewed by deleting opposite party No.1 and mentioning Rs.1,20,760/- in place of Rs.1,70,760/- and this would form part and parcel of the order dated: 28.11.2022 passed in Appeal No.1942/2017.

LADY MEMBER                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

Knmp*