West Bengal

Howrah

EA/10/2

SRI. MADAN NEOGI. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MR. A.R. SEKAR. - Opp.Party(s)

27 May 2010

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Execution Application No. EA/10/2
 
1. SRI. MADAN NEOGI.
S/O- Late P.C. Neogi, 40, Kala Bagan Lane, P.S. Shibpur, Howrah – 711 104 ( W.B. ).
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MR. A.R. SEKAR.
General Manager, M/S. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., The New India Assurance Building, 87, M.G. Road, Fort Mumbai, PIN – 400 001.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. J.N. Ray PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. Dr. D. Chakraborty MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. SMT. SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

Sri Madan Neogi,

Son of Late P.C. Neogi,

residing at 40, Kala Bagan Lane, P.S. Shibpur,

Howrah – 711 104 ( W.B. ). ----Petitioner / Decree holder.

                       

                      -  Versus –

 

1.    Mr. A. R. Sekar,

       General Manager,

       representing M/S. The New India Assurance

       Co. Ltd., The New India Assurance Building,

       87, M.G. Road, Fort Mumbai,

       PIN – 400 001.

 

2.     Mr. Swapan Kumar Paul,

        Divisional Manager,

        representing M/s. The New India Assurance

        Co. Ltd., 23, Ganesh Ch. Avenue,

         Kolkata – 7000 13.

 

3.       Mr. T. K. Das,

          Divisional Manager,

          Representing M/s. The New India Assurance

          Co. Ltd., P – 18, Dobson Lane,

           “Madhusudan Apartment”,

           Howrah – 1. ----------------------- Judgment debtors /

                                                                 opposite parties. 

                          P    R    E    S     E     N     T 

1.   Hon’ble President :  Shri J.N. Ray.

2.   Hon’ble Member   :   Dr. Dilip Kr. Chakraborty.

3.   Hon’ble Member   :   Smt. Samiksha Bhattacharya.

 

 O R D E R  NO.6                                Date  :  27-05-2010.

 

Decree holder is present through his authorized person.

 

S/R of notice is not received against the o.p. no. 1. Decree holder files an application through his authorized person praying for dispose of the case on the ground of receiving the decreetal amount. Similarly the judgment debtor also files an application praying for dispose of the case on the ground of payment of the decreetal dues to the decree holder along with a xerox copy of the cheque therewith.

 

Heard on both sides. It is submitted that in compliance of the order the judgment debtor has paid the decreetal dues to the decree holder by a cheque bearing no. 840409 dated 06-05-2010 drawn on Corporation Bank and the decree holder acknowledged the receipt of the cheque and submits that the case be disposed of in full satisfaction.

 

Having heard on both sides and also perusal of the xerox copy of the cheque therein we dispose of the case on full satisfaction. 

 

                               

                Supply the copy of the order to the parties, free of costs.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. J.N. Ray]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Dr. D. Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. SMT. SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.