Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/19/93

Dr Santhosh kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mr Chirag.singh Varma - Opp.Party(s)

30 Mar 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/93
( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 2019 )
 
1. Dr Santhosh kumar
venadu hospital,nedumangadu,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mr Chirag.singh Varma
near janth mandhir,mundapara,ajmeer
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

 

C.C.No. 93/2019 Filed on 03/04/2019

ORDER DATED: 30/03/2023

 

Complainant:

:

Dr.Santhosh Kumar, residing at Venadu Hospital, Nedumangadu, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 541.

                       (By Adv.G.Anilkumar)

Opposite parties

:

  1. Mr.Chirag Singh Varma, Adventure Wolves Near Janthi Mandir , 10-Ganapathi Nagar, Mundapara, Ajmeer, Rajasthan – 305 001.
  2. The Proprietor, Mr. Chirag Singh Varma, Adventure Wolves Near Janthi Mandir , Ajmeer, Rajasthan State.

(By Adv.Arjun Sreekumar)

 

ORDER

 

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR: MEMBER

 

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter thecommission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service.After admitting the complaint notice was issued to opposite parties.After accepting the notice the opposite parties appeared before this commission and filed version.Thereafter the complainant filed proof affidavit and documents.Since 26/08/2022 the case was posted for marking documents of complainant.But the complainant was absent.The complainant not turned up for marking documents before this Commission.In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

In the result complaint is dismissed for default.There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 30th day of March,  2023.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN                                                                   

 

:

 

PRESIDENT

                 Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

  •  

 

MEMBER

 

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.