West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/387

Dr.Satya Ranjan Biswas - Complainant(s)

Versus

MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LTD., - Opp.Party(s)

31 Jul 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/387
 
1. Dr.Satya Ranjan Biswas
S/O-Late Priyasankar Biswas, 30/4,Radhamadhab Dutta Garden Lane, Beliaghata Main Road, Kolkata-700 010.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LTD.,
MPSEnclave, Commercial Building,Vill-Dighisole, P.O.-Dahijuri, Jhargram, West Midnapore - 721 504.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     11-11-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      05-12-2013.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     31-07-2014.

 

 

 

Dr. Satya Ranjan Biswas,

 

s/o late Priyasankar Biswas,

residing at 30/4, Radhamadhab Dutta  Garden Lane,

Beliaghata Main Road, Kolkata – 700010.

  

 

Smt. Mondira Ghosh,

 

wife of Sri Nimai  Ghosh,

residing at 2/4, Bonomali  Ghosh Lane, P.O. Santragachi,

District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104.

 

 

Santu Kumar   Ghosh,

 

 

 

 

 

 

son  of Sri Nimai Ghosh,

residing at 2/4, Bonomali Ghosh Lane, P.O. Santragachi,

District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104,

for self and the constituted attorney of the

complainant nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 15.

 

Smt. Suvra  Ghosh,

wife of Sri  Sanjoy  Ghosh,

residing at 1/5, Bholanath Nandy Lane,

P.O. Santragachi, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104.

 

Sri Sanjoy Ghosh,

son of Sri  Sujit  Ghosh,

residing at f1/5, Bholanath Nandy Lane, P.O. Santragachi,

District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104.

 

Sri Jay Prakash Sharma,

son of Sri Ramkripal  Sharma,

residing at 16, Mahesh Paul Lane,

Santragachi, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104.

 

Sri Gurupada Manna,

son of late Prafulla Kumar Manna,

residing at Alkatan Salt Lake, Secotor – 3,

Kolkata – 700097.

 

Sri Sadhan Malo,

son of late  Tufani Malo,

residing at 16, Tin Nath Pally, P.O. Nowbhanga, P.S. Salt Lake,

Kolkata – 105.

 

Sri Badal Roy,

son of late Nityananda Road,

residing at 53C/9, Dr. Suresh Chandra Banerjee Road,

Kolkata – 700010.

 

Smt. Suparna Das,

wife of Sri Tapan Das,

residing at 36/3, K.N. Ghatak Road, Noapara,

Shyamnagar, District – 24 Parganas ( N ),

PIN – 743127. 

Smt. Sagarika Paul,

wife of Sri Jayanta Kumar Paul,

residing at Hari Harpur, P.O. Hridaypur

near  Girls High School,

Kolkata – 700027.

 

Smt.  Chhaya Saha,

wife of Sri Mrinal Kanti Saha,

residing at 19/R,  Abinash Chandra Banerjee Lane,

Kolkata – 700010.

 

Ms. Aparna Das,

d/o. Sri Tapan Das,

residing at 36/3, K.N.  Ghatak Road, Noapara,

Shyamnagar, District – 24 Parganas ( N ),

PIN – 743127. ------------------------------------------------------Complainants.

 
 
 

-       Vs.    

 
 

1.

MPS Greenery Developers Ltd.,

 

MPS ENCLAVE Commercial Building Village Dighisole, P.O. Dahijuri Jhargram

 

West Midnapore 721504.

  
  

2.

MPS Greenery Developers Ltd. Mr. Santanu Chowdhury

 

MPS ENCLAVE, P- 112, Block B Lake Town Kolkata

 

Kolkata 700 089

  
  

3.

MPS Greenery Developers Ltd.

 In-Charge Viz Mr. Palash Pattanayak and Mr. Amit Adya,

 

11/2/1 Bhagawan Chatterjee Lane,

 

 

 

Howrah 711 101.

 

  
  

4.

MPS Greenery Developers Ltd. OM TOWERS,

 

32, Chowringhee Road,

 

Kolkata 700 071

  
  

5.

Mr. Pramatha Nath Manna, Chairman CUM Managing Director,

 

344A, Lake Town Kolkata

 

Kolkata 700 089

  
  

6.

Mr. Amiya Kumar Banerjee, Director,

 

having its residential address at 6, Haripada Bhattacharya Lane,

3rd floor, P.O. Santragachi, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104. ------------------------------------------- Opposite Parties.

  

 

                                                P   R    E     S    E    N     T

 

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

 

 

F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

1.                  Complainants of thirteen   numbers, namely 1)  Dr. Satya Ranjan Biswas,     2)

Smt. Mondira  Ghosh, 3)  Santu Kumar Ghosh, 4) Smt.  Suvra Ghosh, 5) Sri Sanjoy Ghosh, 6) Sri Jayprakash  Sharma, 7) Sri  Gurupada Manna, 8) Sri Sadhan Malo, 9) Sri Badal Roy, 10) Smt.  Suparna Das, 11) Smt. Sagarika Paul, 12) Smt.  Chhaya Saha, 13) Ms. Aparna Das,     by filing a joint petition U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) have prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.ps. to pay their respective maturity amount of the investments along with due monthly  interest, to pay an amount of Rs. 8,50,000/- in total as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment along with litigation costs of Rs. 25,000/- and other orders as the Forum may deem fit and proper. 

 

2.               Brief fact of the case is that complainants  made  investments of different types i.e. in monthly  income scheme  as well as in fixed deposit scheme issued by the o.ps., on different dates vide  Annexures P/2 to P/21 collectively.  Their certificate nos. are as follows :

 

     Dr. Satya Ranjan Biswas - Bond No.  KA001 A/06/10/003782,     

   Smt. Mondira  Ghosh - Bond No.  KA001  A/09/10/004883, KA001 A/07/11/000226,

   Santu Kr.  Ghosh -     Bond No.  A/09/10/008043,

   Suvra  Ghosh – Bond No. A/09/10/004887,

   Sanjoy Ghosh – Bond No. A/09/10/004894,

   Shri  Jayprakash Sharma – Bond No. KA001 A/08/10/012414, 

   Sri  Gurupada Manna - Bond No.  A/07/10/005725, 

  

   Sri Sadhan Malo - Bond No.  KA001 A/06/10/012947,

   Sri Badal Roy - Bond No.  KA001 A/07/10/015048,

   Smt.  Suparna Das - Bond No.  HW 009 A/07/10/015523, KA001 O/12/09/007935,

                                                      HW 009  O/01/08/005698, KA001 O/11/07/002030, 

 

   Smt. Sagarika Paul, FR010 A/02/11/007899,

   Smt. Chhaya Saha – Bond No. K001 O/11/10/007973,

   Smt. Aparna Das    - Bond No.  A/07/10/015497.

 

O.Ps.  promised to pay monthly interest of different amounts for different amount of investments made by the complainants on different dates. But it is alleged by the complainants that o.ps. failed to pay monthly  interest regularly. Complainants repeatedly went to the office of o.ps. but on different pleas they have returned the complainants  without giving their  interest amount. It is further stated by the complainants that with this monthly income, they run their livelihood, meet their medical expenditure, children’s education etc. which are really at stake. Complainants even submitted a joint petition on 05-09-2013  vide Annexure running pages 84 requesting them to pay the monthly interest. They have also informed the matter of non payment of monthly interest as well as maturity amount to different police stations vide Annexure 85. But they did not pay any heed to that request.  So, finding no other alternative, complainants  filed this instant petition praying for the aforesaid relief. 

 

1.                           Notices were served. They   appeared and filed  written version. Accordingly, case was heard on contest.

 

2.                           Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainants are  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

3.                           Both the points are taken up together for consideration. We have carefully gone through the written version filed by o.ps. and noted its contents. It is the specific plea taken by o.ps. that SEBI had prohibited the o.ps. to disburse, transfer, alienate any immovable property held by them vide their order no. RO/003/2014 dated  06th June, 2014 in Annexures – 1 & 2 of the said order marked as Annexure ‘C’ series. O.ps. have  also attached the order passed by Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2, Paschim Midnapur, whereby the bank account of o.ps. had been attached by the said  authority vide Annexure A series. O.ps. have also annexed the order passed by the  Additional  Secretary and Inspector General of Registration and Commissioner of Stamp and Revenue of Government of West Bengal dated 06-05-2013 as  Annexure ‘B’. And on these  grounds the o.ps. have  prayed for the dismissal of the complaint petition on the plea that complainants have not made SEBI as an opposite  party who have attached their bank accounts. And on this very ground o.ps. are not in a position to withdraw any amount from their bank accounts.  But o.ps. have not annexed any order of any higher authority   showing that there is any kind of specific embargo on the payment of maturity amount of different complainants as well as their  monthly interest. And for argument sake, even if the bank accounts are attached by the SEBI, are the complainants responsible for that ?  Why they should be harassed like anything ? People invest their hard earned money in a reputed company to get the ultimate benefit at their need. If they cannot utilize their hard-earned money at their bare necessities what is the use of making an investment or savings ? Sacrificing many present enjoyments involving monetary expenditure, people make an investment for all future needs. So entire spirit of making investment is getting frustrated.   O.ps. have miserably failed to keep their promise which they made on the face of the Bond certificates issued by them in favour of  different complainants on different dates. For their own wrong doings, why complainants should suffer at all ?  Accordingly, the plea taken by o.ps. is not at all tenable with respect to the non-payment of maturity values as well as monthly interest. May be it is true that in some cases, the maturity dates have not yet been over. But as the O.Ps. failed to pay the monthly interest in time, complainants have lost their all faith on O.Ps.   O.ps. have miserably failed   to keep their own promise which certainly amounts to deficiency in  service on their  part which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.   And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainants should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.

 

      Hence,

 

                                    O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

           

      That the C. C. Case No. 387  of 2013 ( HDF 387 of 2013 )  be  allowed on contest with  costs  against  the O.Ps. 

 

      That the  O.Ps. are directed jointly and severally  to pay the principal amounts  as well as maturity amounts   with upto date monthly interest to the  complainants of this instant petition with respect to all Bond certificates in question held by the respective complainants within one month from this order i.d., 10% p.a. interest shall be charged on the entire decretal amounts of different complainants till actual payment.

 

            No order as to compensation. The complainants do get an award of Rs.10,000/- as litigation cost and o.ps. are directed to pay the same within one month from this order i.d. amount shall carry an interest @ 10% p.a. till actual payment

 

      The complainants are at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

       

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.            

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

 

 

                                                                   

      (  Jhumki Saha  )                                                                  

  Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.