IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM
Dated, the 28th day of December, 2023
Present: Sri. Manulal V.S. President
Sri. K.M. Anto, Member
C C No. 162/2023 (Filed on 27/05/2023)
Complainant : Tiju Abraham,
Puthenpurayil House,
Pampady P.O, Poralloor,
Kottayam – 686 502.
Vs.
Opposite party : More Retails Private Limited(SM),
Ground Floor, Kandathil Building,
Pampady P.O,
Kottayam – 686 502.
O R D E R
Sri. Manulal V.S. President
This complaint was filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.
This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party.
Upon receipt of notice from this Commission opposite party did not appeared before the Commission or not filed version.
The case of the complainant is that he had purchased a Colgate Kids Tooth Paste from the opposite party. The opposite party hard collected Rs.147/- from the complainant instead of Rs.140/- which is printed as the MRP on the packet of the product. Hence alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party complainant approached this Commission for redressing his grievance.
The complainant has not filed any affidavit or documents. It is found that though the complainant has raised allegations against the opposite party, he has not adduced any evidence by way of affidavit or documents to substantiate his case against the opposite party, despite giving sufficient opportunities. As the complainant was continuously absent, notice was issued from this Commission to the complainant to appear before this Commission on 18/12/2023. The notice was returned as “Left without instruction”. As the complainant has not filed an affidavit or documents to substantiate his allegations, we find that the complainant miserably failed to establish his case against the opposite party. In the above circumstances, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed.
Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 28th day of December, 2023
Sri. Manulal V.S. President Sd/-
Sri. K.M. Anto, Member Sd/-
Appendix : Nil. By Order,
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
