Haryana

StateCommission

A/527/2015

ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. AND ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MONIKA GANDHI - Opp.Party(s)

PARDEEP SOLATH

02 Mar 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

 

First Appeal No.           527 of 2015

                                                Date of the Institution:           12.06.2015

                                                Date of Decision:-        02.03.2016

 

1.      Ansal Housing & Construction Limited, SCO No.34, Swastik Vihar, MDC, Panchkula through its Sr. Manager (Marketing).

 

2.      Ansal Housing & Construction Limited, 15 UGF, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi – 110001 through its General Manager (Marketing).

                                      Appellants-Opposite Parties

Versus

 

Monika Gandhi d/o Sh. L.C. Gandhi, resident of House No.499, Sector 20A, Chandigarh.

Respondent-Complainant

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

Present:-    Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for the appellants

 

 

O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          On July 08^th, 2015 following order was passed by this Commission:-

          “1.               Ansal Housing & Construction Limited and another-opposite parties are in appeal against the order dated 27^th April, 2015 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula, whereby, complaint filed by Monika Gandhi was allowed.  Operative part of the order reads as under:-

                   “14.   ……..The Ops are directed as under:-

1. To handover the possession of the flat/unit to the complainant within one month and the complainant is bound to get the sale deed registered within two months from the date of issue of this order.
2. To pay Rs.5000/- as compensation for mental agony and harassment.

2.                Learned counsel for the appellants has urged that appellants were and are ready to handover the possession of the flat provided the complainant gets the sale-deed executed in her favour.

3.                Notice be issued to the respondent by registered post acknowledgment due for 04.09.2015.

4.                Record of the District Forum be called for.

          5.                In the meanwhile, implementation of the impugned order is stayed.”

2.      Learned counsel for the appellants has placed on record Settlement Agreement (Annexure A) whereby the parties have compromised the matter.  Since the matter has been compromised, learned counsel has urged that this appeal be disposed of being infructuous.

3.      It is ordered accordingly.

4.      The statutory amount of Rs.2500/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellants against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules, after the expiry of period of appeal/revision, if any.

 

 

March 02nd, 2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

(U.K.)