Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/14/948

SANTHOSH - Complainant(s)

Versus

MONDELEZ INDIA FOODS LTD(FORMERLY CADBURY INDIA LTD) - Opp.Party(s)

M.R.NANDAKUMAR

06 Apr 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/948
 
1. SANTHOSH
PUTHENPURACKAL,PERUMPILLY,ERNAKULAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MONDELEZ INDIA FOODS LTD(FORMERLY CADBURY INDIA LTD)
MONDELEZ HOUSE,UNIT NO.2001,20 TH FLOOR, TOWER-3,WING-C,INDIA BULLS FINANCE CENTRE,PAREL,MUMBAI-400013
2. BIG BAZAR(FUTURE RETAIL LTD)
GOLD SOUK GRANADE PONNURUNNI,VYTTILA POST,COCHIN-682019
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

 

Date of filing : 22.12.2014

Date of Order : 06.04.2016

Present:-

Shri Cherian K. Kuriakose, President

Shri. Sheen Jose, Member.

Smt. V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

 

C.C. No. 948/2014

Between

 

Santhosh, :: Complainant

S/o. Balakrishnan, (By Adv. M.R. Nanda Kumar,

Puthenpurakkal, Providence Junction, Cochin - 18)

Perumpilly, Ernakulam.

And

 

1. Mondelez India Foods Ltd., :: Opposite parties

(Formerly Cadbury India Ltd.) (BY Adv. V.B. Unniraj, F-18,

Mondelez House, Unit No. 2001, Vth Floor, The Esplanade,

20th Floor, Tower-3 (Wing C), Convent Junction, Ernakulam,

India Bulls Finance Centre, Kochi - 11)

Parel, Mumbai – 400 013.

 

2. Big Bazaar (Future Retail Ltd.),

Gold Souk Grande Ponnurunni,

Vyttila Post, Cochin – 682 019.

 

O R D E R

 

Cherian K. Kuriakose, President.

 

Complainant absent. No representation by the Counsel concerned. Stay order produced is no specific as to which order of this Forum is stand. It is seen that the stay order is passed on 14.01.2016 by a single member of the State Commission, in an appeal filed against the Order No. CC No. 948/14 of C.D.R.F. Ernakulam, without mentioning the date of Order appealed against 2nd Counsel for complainant is not present. Learned Counsel for opposite party is also not represented, to inform as to which orders is stepped by a member of Hon'ble State Commission. Today since complainant is absent, even when the case is listed, the complaint stands dismissed for default. No cost.

Pronounced in open Forum on this the 6th day of April, 2016.

 

Sd/-Cherian K. Kuriakose, President.

Sd/- V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

Sd/- Sheen Jose, Member.

 

Forwarded/By Order

 

 

 

Senior Superintendent.

 

Date of Despatch of the Order :
By Hand :

By Post :

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.