Kerala

StateCommission

273/2006

The Manager,LIC of India Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Molly Paulose - Opp.Party(s)

G.S.Kalkura

23 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. 273/2006
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
 
1. The Manager,LIC of India Ltd
Divisional Office,Ernakulam
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL NO.273/2006

JUDGMENT DATED: 23 .11.2010

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                   : PRESIDENT

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                       : MEMBER

 

1.Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd.,   : APPELLANTS

   Divisional Office, Ernakulam,

   Rep. by the Manager (Legal & HPF),

   LIC of India,

   Jeevan Prakash, M.G.Road, P.B.No.1133,

   Ernakulam-682 011.

 

2. Branch Manager, LIC of India,

    Muvattupuzha Branch, Muvattupuzha,

    Rep. by the Manager, (Legal & HPF),

    LIC of India, Jeevan Prakash,

    M.G.Road, P.B.No.1133,

    Ernakulam – 682 011.

 

(By Adv.G.S.Kalkura)

 

           Vs.

 

Molly Paulose,

Panichikudy House,                                     : RESPONDENT

Parayithottam Road, Kuthukuzhy.P.O.,

Kothamangalam, Ernakulam District.

 

ORDER

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU           : PRESIDENT

 

          The appellants are the opposite parties/LIC of India in CC.556/05 in the file of CDRF, Ernakulm.  Appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- and cost of Rs.2000/- to the complainant.

          2. The case of the complainant is that her husband had availed the LIC policy for a sum of Rs.50000/-.  He died on 27.7.04 on account of cardiac arrest due to peri operative mio cardial infarct. In the post mortum report the reason for the death mentioned is coronary insufficiency.  The claim was repudiated.  It is denied that there was any material suppression.  It is further alleged that the proposal form was filled up by the agent of the opposite party. It is after medical check up that the proposal was accepted .  The reason mentioned in the post mortum report for the death has no nexus with the disease such as “episodes of right sided facial pain”.  Hence he has sought for the assured amount of Rs.50000/- with interest and cost.

          3. The opposite parties have filed version admitting the policy but contended that the averments in the proposal form dated 12.2.2002 were false. It is pointed out that within a short period of 2 years and 5 months death took place.  The death was occasioned consequent to the surgery done for trigeminal   neuralgia.  It is also mentioned in the medical certificate that the deceased had repeated episodes of right sided facial pain since 1996.  In the certificate of the Neuro Surgeon dated 28.7.04 it is mentioned that the deceased had recurrent attacks of lancinating pain starting from the bridge of the nose on the right side and spreading towards vertex on the right side along upper eye lid.  It is also mentioned therein that since 1996 deceased used to get pain initiated with activities like sudden opening or closing of eyes, sudden opening of mouth, chewing food on right side, swallowing cold water etc. The deceased was taking various combinations of medicines like zen retard, zeptol, Gafaptin etc. since 1996.  He was diagnosed as having leukopenia at Sree Chitira Thirunal Medical Institute and also underwent treatment therein.  He was advised R.F. Lesion but agreed for  M U D after fully being informed of the risk involved. The  insured was duty bound to disclose of all material facts relating to his health, ailments and hospitalization etc.  He has filled the proposal form on 12.2.2002 fully aware to his past ailments of recurring attack of lancinating pain from 1996.  He has replied as to the colums with respect to the ailments, treatment, hospitalization etc in the negative and has stated that his state of health is good.  He has signed the above declaration in the proposal form.  He has suppressed the illness which is sufficient ground for repudiation  evenif there is no nexus between the cause of death and concealed fact.

          4. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1, DW1; Exts.A1 to A5, B1 to B4.

          5. The cause of death mentioned in Ext.A5 post mortum certificate is death due to coronary insufficiency.  Ext.B1 is the copy of the proposal form wherein the colums with respect to the illness and habits like drinking etc and as to whether he has ever been admitted to a hospital etc are all answered in the negative. The state of health is mentioned as good.  Ext.B2 is the medical  attendant’s certificate issued by the Consultant Neuro surgeon of Medical Trust Hospital, Ernakulam.  The cause of death is mentioned as acute pre operative mio cardiac infarct .  It is mentioned  that the  patient was operated for ® trigeminal   neuralgia.  Ext.B3 is another certificate issued by the same doctor wherein the date of admission is mentioned as 18.7.04 and death as on 27.7.04.  The history of the patient is mentioned  as repeated episodes of right sided facial pain since 1996.  The diagnosis is  ® V I  trigeminal   neuralgia.  Ext.B4 is the copy of the treatment details at Medical Trust Hospital. It is mentioned that he was having a history of sudden onset of recurrent attacks of lancinating pain starting from the bridge of nose on the right side and spreading towards vertex on the right side along upper eye lid since 1996. Pain gets initiated with activities like sudden opening or closing of eyes, sudden opening of mouth, chewing food on right side, swallowing cold water.  Pain lasts for less than a minute and resolves completely without a sequelae .  There was no history of trauma/® facial weakness/ ® facial numbness, not a known diabetes mellitus /hypertension/ ischaemic  heart disease.  He was on various combination of medications (Zen retard,Zeptol, Carbamozepine, Gabaptin, Eptoin, Tryptomed, analgesics, steroids) since 1996.  He was found to be Leukopenic at Sree Chitra Thirunal Medical Institute (drug induced) for which he was consulted by Hematologist and treated accordingly.  Patient was advised RF lesion at Sree Chithra Thirunal Medical Institute but agreed for MUD.  He was admitted for observation and management of Leukopenia  and ® trigeminal   neuralgia.  He underwent microvascular decompression of right trigeminal   neuralgia on 27.7.04.  Peri-operatively abberent vessels (superior  petrosal vein tributary and  S.C.A loop) were identified in close  proximity to the  right trigeminal   nerve.  These vessels were separated and Teflon sheet placed  between trigeminal   nerve and the surrounding vessels after coagulation and division of all superior petrosal vein tributaries. After adequate haemostasis dural closure was started. Patient developed ST changes followed by cardiac arrest due to peri-operative myocardial infarct.  Cardiologist was consulted and appropriate measures taken. Cardio pulmonary  resuscitation was started and continued in post operative ward after wound closure. His cardiopulmonary  status continued to deteriorate in spite of active resuscitation  measures.  He died at 9.30PM on 27.7.04.

          6. Leukopenia is an abnormal decrease in the number of white blood cells due to adverse drug reaction, pathological condition etc.  The complainant has not produced any previous treatment records.  It is seen from Ext.B4 treatment  record of Medical Trust Hospital that the  deceased was having right sided trigeminal   neuralgia since 1996.  It is mentioned that he was having sudden onset of recurrent attacks of lancinating pain on the right side of the face from the upper eye lid.  It was for the above illness that he underwent surgery and it was during the surgery that he developed cardiac arrest.  Cardiac arrest due to perioperative myocardial infarct cannot be disassociated from the surgery that he underwent for right trigeminal   neuralgia.  It was  during the surgery for the trigeminal   neuralgia that the deceased had the cardiac arrest.  Hence the contention of the complainant and the finding of the Forum that there is no nexus between cardiac arrest and the ® trigeminal   neuralgia cannot be sustained.   Being a contract based on good faith the deceased was bound to  disclose the  trigeminal   neuralgia that he was having.  The above illness cannot be treated as a minor one.  Treatment for the above illness that included surgery is a major one.  Hence we find that the contention that there was  no nexus between the illness that he was having  and the illness on account of  which he died  cannot be upheld.  Hence we find the order of the Forum can not be sustained.  The order of the forum is setaside.  The appeal is allowed.

          Office will forward the LCR along with the copy of this order to the Forum.

 

          JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                   : PRESIDENT

 

 

          SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                       : MEMBER

 

ps

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.