Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1094/05

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

MOHD ILLYASUDDIN MATEEN - Opp.Party(s)

M/S N.V.DESHPANDE

19 Sep 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1094/05
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)
 
1. AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD
M.D A A1 AND A2 ENKAY CENTER UDYOG VIHAR PHASE V GURGAON 16
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MOHD ILLYASUDDIN MATEEN
R/O 13-3-20 MASTUDI PURA KARWAN HYD
Andhra Pradesh
2. SMART VALUE FOREX AND TRAVELS PVT LTD
M.D IST FLOOR N.V.PLAZA DWARAKAPURI COLONY SAIBABA TEMPLE STREET PANZAGUTTA HYD
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1094/2005 against C.D. 261/2003, Dist. Forum-I,Hyderabad

 

Between:

 

American Express Bank Ltd.,

Travel Related Services

Rep. by its Managing Director

At A, A1 & A2,EnkayCenter

Udyog Vihar, Phase-V

Gurgaon-16         O.P. No. 1 

         1. Mohd. Ilyasuddin Mateen

S/o. Mohd. Waheeuddin

Age: 31 years,

R/o. 13-3-20, Mastudi Pura

Karwan, Hyderabad-500 006.                                                                                                                    2. 

Rep. by its Managing Director

Regd. Office at N.V.Plaza, Dwarakapuri Colony

Saibaba Temple Street

Punjagutta,Hyderabad.                                                                                               

 

Counsel for the Appellant:                                                  

Counsel for the Resp:                                

                                                                  

 

QUORUM:

              

&

                                     

 

 

FRIDAY, THIS THE NINETEENTH

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

         Hyderabad 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                  police.     Hyderabad.      demanding the amount.  

 

               Bangkok.  Thereupon it requested him to provide a copy of the import licence, name of the establishment from which the complainant intends to purchase, source of funds,      

 

There was negligence on       

 

                   

 

              

 

 

Exs. B7 to B9 TCs were altogether different from the   

 

                     

 

            Rs. 2,46,750/- as he intends to visit Bangkok.   

           Bangkok.    

 

 

There is no statement from the complainant recorded by the investigator to that affect. The appellant has suppressed the report of the investigator                            

 

 

 

 

 

 

            It has         We may state that this is a misleading argument.        

if a contention of forgery or       

 

 

 

 

 

 

When the originals were destroyed, the question of sending them to expert will not arise.  by using chemicals etc., it would not have kept quiet                 Civil Court         

 

          

 

         

                  

                                               

 

 

*pnr

 

 

 

 

 

CORRECTED – O.K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.