Kerala

StateCommission

A/09/487

Integrated Finance Co. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mohan Paul - Opp.Party(s)

S.Reghukumar

24 Feb 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/09/487
(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/12/2008 in Case No. EA 25/08 of District Trissur)
1. Integrated Finance Co. Ltd.Kerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. Mohan PaulKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

IA.1009/2009 in A.487/09

ORDER DATED: 24.2.2010

PRESENT

JISTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                   : MEMBER

 

George Kuruvilla,                                  : PETITIONER

Managing Director,

M/s Integrated Finance Co.Ltd.,

VAIRAMS,

112, Thyagaraya Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai-600017.

 

(By Adv.S.Reghukumar)

 

                    vs.

Mohan Paul,                                                 : RESPONDENT

Proprietor,

Jose Theatre,

Thrissur.

(By Adv.G.S.Kalkura)

 

 

ORDER

 

JISTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

 

Delay sought to be condoned is of 7 months and 28 days. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition by the power of attorney holder of the petitioner it is mentioned that due  to  the inadvertent omission  the notice of posting of the EA was misplaced.

2. The respondent/complainant has filed objection denying the genuineness of the case set up by the petitioner and contending that the petitioner is only attempting to  protract the matter.

We find that the execution is with respect to the realisaiton of the amounts deposited in the petitioner/company.  We find misplacing of the records is not a sufficient reason.  The  deposits are of the year 2000. We find that the petitioner did not establish sufficient reason to condone the delay.  In the result the IA is dismissed and consequently the appeal is also dismissed.

 

JISTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

 

 

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA           : MEMBER

 

 

 

ps

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 24 February 2010

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT