Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

RP/37/2022

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mohamed Vaisul Rahiman - Opp.Party(s)

M.Arunachalam

15 Dec 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                 BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                     Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 RP.NO. 37/2022

(Against the order in CC.No. 39/2022, on the file of

District Consumer Commission, Dharmapuri@Krishnagiri)

 

                                                      DATED THIS THE 15^th  DAY OF DECEMBER  2022

 

M/s Bajaj Auto Limited,

Rep.by its Authorized Signatory,

Bajaj Auto Ltd, Complex, Mumbai-Pune Road,

Akurdi, Pune 411 035 

Maharashtra                                           ..Rev.petitioner/4^th opposite party

 

                                        Vs

1.P.Natraj,

S/o M.Palanisamy,

LIG L-126, Old ASTC Hudco,

Near Thangam Nursing Home ,

Hosur – 635 109                                       ..1^st Respondent/complainant

 

2. The Proprietor /Dealer

M/s Sathy Motors,

No.105, Gopi Main Road,

Vailkalmedu, near Jaisakthi Theater

Sathyamangalam, Erode District – 638 401     ..2^nd Respondent/1^st opposite party

 

3.  The Proprietor/Dealer,

M/s S.V.Motors,

No.6, K.V.Complex,

Kudhalli Pappanna Laopposite party

Hosur Road, Attibele, Bangalore District,

Karnataka – 562 107                                     ..3^rd Respondent/2^nd opposite party

 

4. The Proprietor/Dealer,

M/s Akash Bajaj,

No. 72 &65, Chennathur,

NH-7, Next to Anand Electronics,

Hosur, Krishnagiri District 635 109                  ..4^th Respondent/3^rd opposite party

 

 

Counsel for the Rev.petitioner/4^th opposite party      : M/s N.K.ArulMuruganandham

 

          This petition is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                       Docket order

 

          No representation for Revision petitioner. This RP is posted today for appearance of Revision petitioner and for production of paper publication taken to R1 or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence the Revision petition is dismissed for default.

 

               Sd/-                                                                                               Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                  

      MEMBER                                                                                                  PRESIDENT