Haryana

Ambala

CC/225/2013

ANIL KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

MODERN AUTOMOBILES. - Opp.Party(s)

VARUN

17 May 2016

ORDER

CC No.225 of 2013

                                                                          Anil Kumar Vs. Modern Automobiles

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.1.

                        Reply of Op No.2 already received by post.

 

                        Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance. Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M.

                                                                            Sd/-                                         Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        17.05.2016.

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.1.

                        Reply of Op No.2 already received by post.

 

                        Case taken up at 12.35 P.M and called repeatedly but none has put in appearance on behalf of complainant.   In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 3.40 P.M.

                                                                          Sd/-                                          Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        17.05.2016

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.1.

                        Reply of Op No.2 already received by post.

 

                        Case taken up at 3.40 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that the case was fixed for evidence of complainant on 07.05.2014 and since then complainant has availed several opportunities to conclude his evidence including last opportunity but failed to conclude the same rather opted not to come present before the Forum wherefrom it is presumed that complainant is not interested in pursuing the complaint further more.  Hence, finding no justification in adjourning the case further, the same is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

Announced: 17.05.2016                          Sd/-                                       Sd/-

                                                             Member                                 President