West Bengal

Howrah

CC/68/2024

RAJESH CHOUDHARY - Complainant(s)

Versus

MMI SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

30 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, P.O. and P.S. Howrah, Dist. Howrah-711 101.
Office (033) 2638 0892, 0512 Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/68/2024
( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2024 )
 
1. RAJESH CHOUDHARY
26,MOULANA ABUL KALAM AZAD ROAD, P.S.- GOLABARI, HOWRAH - 711101
HOWRAH
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MMI SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED
123A, BLOCK - A, LAKE TOWN KOLKATA, P.S.- LAKETOWN POLICE STATION, KOLKATA - 700089
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
2. MMI SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED
B-4A, NAMDHARI CHAMBERS, 9/54, D. B. GUPTA ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI - 110005
NEW DELHI
DELHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No:  2                                                                                       Date:30/04/2024

Today is fixed for admission hearing of this case. Complainant is personally present. Heard complainant side. Considered submission.

Perused the complaint petition and its annexed documents.

After going through the complaint petition, it appears that the O.ps. have been running their business beyond the jurisdiction of this District Commission. The complainant has pointed out that he has been residing under P.S. Golabari, District – Howrah which is within the jurisdiction of this District Commission but fact remains that no identity prove has been filed by the complainant to prove that he is a resident of Golabari P.S. District – Howrah. In the absence of prove of identity of the complainant, this case cannot be admitted.

Moreover, the complainant has not filed any money receipt to show that he purchase the demo version of the software from the O.ps. In the absence of money receipt, there is no prove that the complainant has purchase the goods. So, it cannot be said that complainant is a consumer under the O.ps.

It is also important to note that this District Commission after close compare of the complaint petition with the annexed documents finds that the case adopted by the complainant is self contradictory.

Considering all the above noted factors this District Commission is of the view that this complaint case cannot be admitted and so it is dismissed and disposed off. No order is passed as to cost.  

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dhiraj Kumar Dey]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.