Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/17/474

Sanal kumar S - Complainant(s)

Versus

Micromax mobile - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jul 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

   SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR          : MEMBER

SRI.VIJU.V.R                         : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.474/17 (Filed on : 29.11.2017)

ORDER DATED : 19.07.2022

COMPLAINANT

Sanal kumar.S

S/o.Sundaresan,

Varuvila puthen Bunglow,

Avanakuzhy, Nellimoodu.P.O

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 524

 

(By Adv.R.Santhosh & Adv.Akshaya.P.S)

 

                                                VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

  1. Micormax Mobiles,

Rep.by it’s Chief Executive,

Micromax House, 90 B, Sector-18,

Gurgaon/122015, Haryana

 

  1. Micromax Mobiles,
  2.  

Near IOC Pump, Pattom,

          Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004

 

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN          : PRESIDENT

1.       This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties. As the notice issued to the opposite parties were returned with endorsement “addressee left”, the complainant was directed to take steps against the opposite parties. Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities the complainant failed to take steps against the opposite parties. Subsequently, on 25/04/2022 the complainant’s counsel filed a memo stating that the opposite parties 1 & 2 not in existence now and the same was informed to this Commission through that memo. Hence this Commission issued a notice directly to the complainant to appear before this Commission today to further proceed with this complaint. The notice issued to the complainant was served. Complainant not appeared and also not taken any steps against the opposite parties. In the above circumstances, we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

    In the result, the complaint is dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs.

 

   A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

 

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 19th day of July 2022.

                                                                                                  Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                       Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                        Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

 

 

be/

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.