Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/1029/2016

Sudhir Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Micromax Informatics Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Parveen Jain

17 Feb 2017

ORDER

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I
Final Order
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1029/2016
 
1. Sudhir Kumar
S/o Sh. Jajman Singh, H.No. 2555, first floor, Phase 11, sector 65, Mohali. Pin Code 160062.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Micromax Informatics Ltd.
Micromax House 90B, Sector 18, Gurgaon Pin Code-122015, through its Director.
2. SP-AKS TELECOM
Micromax Service Center, Quite Office No. 1, First Floor, Sector 35A, Chandigarh City through is authorized signatory.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. S.S. PANESAR PRESIDENT
  MRS. SURJEET KAUR MEMBER
  Dr. S.K. Sardana MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Parveen Jain with Complainant
 
For the Opp. Party:
Amandeep Singh
 
Dated : 17 Feb 2017
Final Order / Judgement

File taken up in the Lok Adalat. Statement of Sh.Amandeep Singh, Counsel for OP No.1 has been recorded. Statement of Sh.Sudhir Kumar, Complainant in person has also been recorded, in view of which the complaint is ordered to be disposed of as settled. The parties shall be bound by statements made before the Lok Adalat today and the same shall form a part of this order. If the compliance of the undertaking/statement is not made by OP No.1 within the prescribed period, the settled amount (Rs.9650/-) shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of this order till payment is made to the complainant.  

     Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties free of cost. The file be consigned 

 

Statement of Sh.Amandeep Singh, Counsel for OP No.1.

Stated that OP No.1 is ready to refund bill/retail invoice amount of Rs.6650/- (towards the value of the mobile handset in question purchased by the complainant), alongwith Rs.3000/- as compensation, to the complainant within a period of 30 days from today, towards full and final settlement of this complaint.

 

Statement of Sh.Sudhir Kumar s/o Sh.Rajman Singh, aged 34 years, Complainant in person.

I have heard the statement made by Sh.Amandeep Singh, Counsel for OP No.1 today. I have no objection to the above settlement. The mobile handset in question is already lying with OP No.2 (SP-AKS TELECOM Ltd). The accessories of mobile handset in question alongwith original job sheet shall be returned to the OP No.1 at the time of receiving of aforesaid settled amount of Rs.6650/- plus Rs.3000/-. This complaint be disposed of accordingly as settled.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.S. PANESAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[ MRS. SURJEET KAUR]
MEMBER
 
[ Dr. S.K. Sardana]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.