Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/117/2017

Aman Dhir - Complainant(s)

Versus

Micromax House - Opp.Party(s)

Shobit Phutela

01 Nov 2017

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh

 

Execution Application NO. 117  OF  2017

in CC/425/2016

Aman Dhir

Vs

Micromax House

 

BEFORE:

          SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER

          SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER

PRESENT:

Sh.Shobit Phutela, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Amandeep Singh, Counsel for OP/JD.

 

Dated : 1st November 2017

ORDER

     Sh.Amandeep Singh, Counsel for OP/JD has brought a post dated cheque for Rs.13,000/- and made an endorsement on the first page of the execution application itself that total amount due was Rs.13440/-, however, Rs.440/- has been deducted as the complainant has not returned accessories of the handset in question. He has handed over a post dated cheque bearing No.119955 dated 06.11.2017 for Rs.13,000/- to Sh.Shobit Phutela, Counsel for Complainant/DH, who recorded his statement in the shape of endorsement on the first page of the execution application itself withdrawing the instant execution application subject to clearance of the cheque. Photocopy of cheque has been taken on record.  Consequently, instant execution application is dismissed as withdrawn subject to realization of cheque. Warrants, if any sent in this case be called back unexecuted forthwith.

     Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties free of cost. The file be consigned.

 

 

 

 

Sd/-

[SURJEET KAUR]

PRESIDING MEMBER

 

 

Sd/-

[SURESH KUMAR SARDANA]

MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.