Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/378/2024

Aromal R - Complainant(s)

Versus

Metro Brands - Opp.Party(s)

06 Nov 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/378/2024
( Date of Filing : 23 May 2024 )
 
1. Aromal R
chandrothayam,varkala,Tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Metro Brands
karle ,mumbai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No.378/2024 Filed on 23/05/2024

ORDER DATED: 06/11/2024

 

Complainant

:

Aromal.R, Ramesh Chandralayam, Panayara.P.O., Thachodu, Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 145.

                   (Party in person)

Opposite parties

:

  1. Metro Brands Ltd., Corporate Address:401, Zillion, 4th Floor, LBS Marg & CST Road Junction, Kurla (West), Mumbai -400 070.
  2. Metro Brands Ltd (TFS THS01), F Square, Pattom, Keshavadasapuram Road, Opp. Chalakuzhi Junction, Trivandrum – 695 011.

 

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party in respect of the purchase of pair of shows from the opposite party’s showroom.  After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties.  The said notices were accepted by the opposite parties 1 & 2 on 25/07/2024.  When the case came up for consideration today, the parties to the proceedings submitted that the matter is settled.  In view of the settlement arrived at between that parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.    

In the result the complaint is dismissed.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 06th  day of November,  2024.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.