Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/60/2014

Dhakshinamoorthy s/o sellamuthu 2 puthutheru, pankur extn. Kandamangalam post. pondicherry 605102 - Complainant(s)

Versus

Messrs.Mobile Magic 89, M.G.Road, pondicherry-605001 and other - Opp.Party(s)

V.Rajasekharam

09 Jan 2015

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/60/2014
 
1. Dhakshinamoorthy s/o sellamuthu 2 puthutheru, pankur extn. Kandamangalam post. pondicherry 605102
2 puthutheru, pankur extn. Kandamangalam post. pondicherry 605102
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Messrs.Mobile Magic 89, M.G.Road, pondicherry-605001 and other
89, M.G.Road, pondicherry-605001 and other
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

CC  No60/2014

 

Dated this the 9th day of January 2015.

 

 

Dhakshinamoorthy, S/o.Sellamuthu

No.2, Puthutheru, Pankur Extn.,

Kandamangalam Post, Puducherry-605 102.       …     Complainant

                                                                         Vs.

 

1. M/s.Mobile Magic,

    No.89, M.G. Road, Puducherry-1.

 

2. M/s.NANOTech Solutions,

    No.635, MG.Road, Thippu Sahib Street,

    Puducherry.

                                                                             …          Opposite Parties

 

 

 

BEFORE:

 

            THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

            PRESIDENT 

 

 

 

Tmt. PVR. DHANALAKSHMI, B.A.,B.L.,

           MEMBER

 

                                   

FOR THE COMPLAINANT:  Thiru.V.Rajasekaran, Advocate.

 

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES : OP.1 – Thiru.S.S.Thanasekaran, Advocate

                                                                  OP.2 - Exparte 

 

ORDER

 

This is a complaint praying to direct the opposite parties:

  1. To replace a new mobile of same model or to refund the cost of the mobile.
  2. To pay a sum of Rs.55000/- with interest 24% p.a. from the date of this complaint till realisation as compensation under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
  3. To pay the cost.

 

On receipt of summon, the opposite party No.1 filed its reply version and case was posted for enquiry.

 

 

 

Today, when the complaint was called,  the complainant present. Counsel for complainant filed memo stating that "the above said matter is settled out of the Forum and hence I pray this Hon'ble Forum to dispose it as not pressed as it is settled with the complainant full satisfaction".

In view of the endorsement made in the memo, this complaint is hereby dismissed as not pressed. No cost.

 

Dated this the 9th day of January 2015.

 

 

 

  1. ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

(PVR. DHANALAKSHMI)

MEMBER

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.