NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4394/2009

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MEHER SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ARVIND NAYAR

17 May 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4394 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 21/07/2009 in Appeal No. 869/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. KurukshetraHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MEHER SINGHS/o Shri Bakshi Ram, R/0 Village and Post Office Thol, District KurukshetraHaryana ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. ARVIND NAYAR
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 17 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Learned counsel for petitioner and respondent present.  It is brought to our notice by counsel for respondent that since award has been satisfied in execution proceedings to the satisfaction of the respondent, this revision petition has become infructuous.  Counsel for petitioner acknowledges it.  Revision petition having become infructuous is accordingly dismissed.



......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER