NCDRC

RP/4525/2009

SUB POST MASTER & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MEGH RAJ - Opp.Party(s)

MR. NAMIT KUMAR & R.P. SINGH

12 Feb 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 11 Dec 2009
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4525/2009
(Against the Order dated 07/10/2009 in Appeal No. 144/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)

1. SUB POST MASTER & ANR.Tehsil BudhladaMansa2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICESBathinda Division, Divisional Office, Post Office Bazar,Bathinda						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. MEGH RAJR/o Near Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Bareta, Tehsil BudhladaMansa						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER

For the Appellant :

MR. NAMIT KUMAR & R.P. SINGH

For the Respondent :

NEMO

Dated : 12 Feb 2010

ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

REVISION PETITION NO. 4525 OF 2009

(from the order dated 7.10.09 in Appeal No.144/09 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Sub Post Master & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Megh Raj … Respondent

REVISION PETITION NO. 4527 OF 2009

(from the order dated 7.10.09 in Appeal No.376/09 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Sub Post Master & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Dr. Sukhwinder Singh Joshi … Respondent

REVISION PETITION NO. 4528 OF 2009

(from the order dated 30.9.09 in Appeal No.498/08 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Sub Post Master & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Jatinder Kaur … Respondent

REVISION PETITION NO. 4529 OF 2009

(from the order dated 30.9.09 in Appeal No.506/04 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Sub Post Master & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Ashok Kumar … Respondent

REVISION PETITION NO. 4530 OF 2009

(from the order dated 6.10.09 in Appeal No.1586/07 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Sub Post Master & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Joginder Pal & Co. … Respondent

REVISION PETITION NO. 4673 OF 2009

(from the order dated 7.10.09 in Appeal No.546/08 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Union of India & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Gurdev Singh & Ors. … Respondents

REVISION PETITION NO. 4674 OF 2009

(from the order dated 6.10.09 in Appeal No.1392/07 of the State Commission, Punjab)

Senior Post Master, Jalandhar & Anr. … Petitioners

Versus

Ashok Kumar Arora & Ors. … Respondents

State Commission has passed the order in consonance with the order passed by this Commission in a number of similar cases. Fault lay with the complainant as well as the petitioner partly because it accepted the irregular investment and enjoyed the deposits made by the complainant. In a number of cases this Commission has awarded interest at the rate of 6% to balance the equities in cases where the Department of Posts had agreed to pay 6% simple interest on irregular deposits taken after obtaining the instructions/approval from Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Expenditure. State Commission has referred to one of the judgements passed by this Commission. No merits. Dismissed.

However, the period for making the payment is extended by another two months from today. If the petitioner pays the amount within two months, then the costs awarded by the State Commission shall stand waived.

......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER