NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/2400/2017

SECRETARY/MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT/CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE HOSPITAL & 3 ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MEETA DEVI - Opp.Party(s)

M/s ANAND & ASSOCIATES,

28 Mar 2018

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2400 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 16/08/2017 in Complaint No. 218/2017 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. SECRETARY/MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT/CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE HOSPITAL & 3 ORS.
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BASAIDARAPUR.
NEW DELHI-110015
2. DR. VINOD
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BASAIDARAPUR
NEW DELHI-110015
3. DR. MS. SAURAV.
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BASAIDARAPUR
NEW DELHI-110015
4. DR. S.K. RAJU (MS).
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, BASAIDARAPUR
NEW DELHI-110015
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. MEETA DEVI
W/O. MR. JHAGGAR. R/O. B-437, AMAN VIHAR, SULTAN PURI.
NEW DELHI.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT

For the Appellant :
Mr. Nimit Mathur, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. R. K. Mir, Advocate with
Mr. Virender, son of the respondent

Dated : 28 Mar 2018
ORDER

        At the outset, learned Counsel appearing for the Complainant states on instructions from the Complainant’s son, who is present in

-2-

person, that in order to avoid further delay in the disposal of the Complaint, the Complainant would not object to the setting aside of the impugned order whereby the Appellants No.1 and 4, Opposite Parties No.1 and 4 in the original Complaint, have been proceeded against             ex parte as also to grant of an opportunity to them to file their Written Versions, provided the Complainant is adequately compensated for the delay already caused.

        In view of the submission, and bearing in mind the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. vs. M/s Mampee Timbers And Hardwares Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. (C.A. Diary No.2365 of 2017), the Appeal is allowed; the impugned order is set aside and the Appellants No.1 and 4 are permitted to file their respective Written Versions, if so advised, within 30 days from today, subject to their paying to the Complainant a total sum of ₹15,000/- as costs, in addition to the travel and allied expenses already paid.  The said Written Versions shall be taken on record only on receipt of the said costs by the Complainant.

        The Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.