Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/128/2019

M/s. Deccan Estates Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Meenakshi D.Mohan - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. M. Sundar

30 Jul 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/128/2019
( Date of Filing : 04 Jun 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/12/2016 in Case No. CC/235/2003 of District South Chennai)
 
1. M/s. Deccan Estates Ltd.,
(Formerly Known as M/s. Deccan Estate & Construction Ltd) Rep by its Managing Director, Mr.A.Nirmal Gadhiya
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Meenakshi D.Mohan
(Died on 22-11-2008) and Mohan Babu, New Jersey-08873, United States of America
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Jul 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                           BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                               Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                            ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No.128/2019

  (Against the order in C.C. No.235/2003 on the file of the DCDRC, Chennai(South)

                                                                    DATED THE 30TH   DAY OF JULY 2021

 

M/s Deccan Estates Ltd,  

(Formerly known as M/s Deccan Estate & 

   Construction Ltd),

46, Dr.B.N. Road, T.Nagar,

Chennai 600 017

Rep.by its Managing Director

Mr.A.Nirmal Gadhiya                                                                    ..Appellant/opposite party

                                                                                 Vs

1.Meenakshi D.Mohan, (died on 22.11.2008)

2.Mohan babu

No. 198, Driscoll court,

Somerset, New Jersy – 08873

United States of America

(As per order in CMP 126/2009 dated 15.11.2010)                      ..Respondent/complainant

 

Counsel for Appellant/opposite party         : M/s M.Sundar

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today, this Commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                                                       Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Notice not taken for Respondent. The matter is posted to this date for appearance of appellant or for dismissal. Though sufficient opportunities given and posted today for appearance or for dismissal, there is no representation for the appellant. Though passed over and called twice, the appellant neither represented not present. Thereby showing that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the appeal on file. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No cost.

      Sd/-                                                                                                                          Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                              R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.