Orissa

Ganjam

CC/55/2019

Mr. Rutuparna Panda - Complainant(s)

Versus

Medi Assist Insurance, TPA Pvt. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Through Sri Gopal Krishna Panda, Advocate & his Associates for the Complainant

13 Sep 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/55/2019
( Date of Filing : 16 Aug 2019 )
 
1. Mr. Rutuparna Panda
S/o Late Hrushikesh Panda, At - Nandigam, Po - Kharanipada, Ps - Jarada, Ganjam
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Medi Assist Insurance, TPA Pvt. Ltd
(Formally known as Medi Assist India TPA Private Limited), CIN - 085199KA 1999PTC025676, Cashless processing Centre, No. 252/2 Kodichikkanahalli Main Road, Opposite Kailash Building, Bommanahalli, Bangalore - 5650 068
2. Manipal Cigna Health Insurance Company Ltd
(Formerly known as Cigna TTK, Health Insurance Company Ltd.), CINU66000NH2012PLC227948, IRDAI Regd. No. 151, Register Office, 401/402, 4th Floor Rahejatitanium, Off Western Express High Wa
3. Administrator/Superintendent
Sparsh Hospital & Critical Care Private Limited, A/407, Saheed Nagar, Ps. Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar - 751007, Dist. Khurda
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Through Sri Gopal Krishna Panda, Advocate & his Associates for the Complainant, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Through NONE for the OP no. 1 Sri Rama Krushna Panigrahi Advocate for the OP No. 2 Sri Sitanshu Mohan Dwibedy Advocate & Associates for the OP No.3, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 13 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                DATE OF DISPOSAL: 13.09.2023

 

 

PER:   SRI SATISH KUMAR PANIGRAHI, PRESIDENT

 

            The advocate for the O.P. is present and filed hazira. And Ld. Counsel for the O.P. submitted that, the complainant has not taken any steps since September, 2022. None appeared for the complainant on repeated call and no steps filed today. We heard and on perusal of the case record it is found that the complainant is consistently absent after 21.10.2022 and no steps also filed in any point of time to date. It deems that, the complainant does not want to proceed further in the case.

Hence in view of the above circumstances, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution today.

This case is disposed of accordingly.

The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 or they may download same from the www.confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of the order received from this Commission.

The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

 

Pronounced on 13.09.2023.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.