Delhi

StateCommission

A/1034/2014

AXIS BANK LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MEDHA SRIVASTAVA - Opp.Party(s)

03 Dec 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/1034/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/186/2014 of District New Delhi)
 
1. AXIS BANK LTD.
5th FLOOR, ASHOKA ESTATE, N.D.-110001.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MEDHA SRIVASTAVA
S-29, SECTOR-7, JASOLA VIHAR, N.D.-25.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI

(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

           Date of decision: 03.12.2014

First Appeal- 1034/2014

Axis Bank Ltd.

5th Floor, Ashoka Estate,

New Delhi-110001

Through Its Principal Officer/Branch Head

Sector-51, Noida (U.P)

                                                                                    ....Appellant

 

VERSUS

Medha Srivastava

S-29, Sector-7

Jasola Vihar

New Delhi-110025                                                       …….Respondent

 

CORAM

Salma Noor, Member

(N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

1)           In a complaint case bearing no. 186/14 Axis Bank Vs Medha Srivastava, filed before District Forum-VI, M-Block, ITO, New Delhi. On 25.09.2014 was fixed for appearance of the OP, when the OP did not appear and the District Forum ordered to proceed ex-parte.

2)        That is what brings the appellant/OP in appeal before this Commission for setting aside the said ex-parte order.

3)             We have heard counsel for the appellant in this appeal at the admission stage itself.

4)         The version of the appellant/ OP for his non appearance on 25.09.2014 before the District Forum is that due to bonafide mistake the employee of the appellant/OP Axis Bank failed to appear before the District Forum and the case proceeded ex-parte. To support his version an affidavit is filed by the appellant. There is no plausible reason to disbelieve or not to rely and act upon this version of the appellant. Besides, it has always been the consistent policy of the courts to allow a little latitude, so that the parties may contest the case on merits, and an effective order may be passed. Hence, order dt. 25.09.2014 passed by the District Forum against the appellant/ OP is set aside, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 3000/- which the OP will pay to the complainant on the next date and remand back the case to the District Forum with a direction that they will allow the appellant/ OP to file the WS and evidence and decide the case after hearing both the parties. The appellant is directed to appear through his counsel, before the District Forum-VI, M-Block, ITO, New Delhi, on the date fixed in this case.

5)   Copy of this order be sent to District Forum-VI, M-Block, ITO, New Delhi for information and to keep it on record and compliance.  

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.