Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/102/2022

Nikanth Pramod - Complainant(s)

Versus

MD,Royal Enfiled - Opp.Party(s)

16 Feb 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

          SRI.VIJU.V.R                        : MEMBER

CC.NO.102/2022 (Filed on : 16/03/2022)

ORDER DATED : 16/02/2023

COMPLAINANT

Nikanth Pramod,

S/o.P.N.Pramod,

“Nivrithi”, VRA 37,

Anayara Post,

Thiruvananthapuram – Kerala

(Party in person)

                                                          VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

  1. The Managing Director,

Royal Enfiled , A Unit of Elicher Motors Limited,

Tiruvottiyur High Road,

Tiruvottiyur, Chennai – 600019

Tamil Nadu

  1. The Work Manager,

MPIRE Motors,

Vettu Road, Kazhakuttom,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 582

(OP1 by Adv.Sharan Shahier)

(OP2 by Adv.B.N.Mangalan)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN                  : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in respect of the purchase of a Royal Enfield Motor Bike by the complainant from the second opposite party. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. Subsequent to that the complainant filed proof affidavit and documents. The case is now posted to 24/03/2023 for marking documents of the complainant.

3. Meanwhile the complainant filed a memo stating that he is leaving in India and going to settle at Canada with family and hence he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint and sought permission to withdraw the complaint. In order to consider the above referred memo filed by the complainant, the case was suo moto advanced from 24/03/2023 to this date. The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded. In view of the memo filed by the complainant, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed.

                 In the result, complaint is dismissed as not pressed. There will be no order as to costs.

        A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

  Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 16th day of February 2023.

                                                                             Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                           Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R    : MEMBER

 

be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.