Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/282/2024

Rahul C R - Complainant(s)

Versus

MD,KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

27 Jul 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/282/2024
( Date of Filing : 15 Apr 2024 )
 
1. Rahul C R
attukal,manacadu,tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MD,KSEB
pattom,Trivandrum
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PRESENT

SRI. P.V.JAYARAJAN                                           :  PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                                     : MEMBER

SRI. VIJU V.R                                                          : MEMBER

C.C. No. 282/2024      (Filed on 15.04.2024)

ORDER DATED: 27.07.2024

Complainant:

 

Rahul C.R., ARA 164, Krishna Kripa, Attukal, Chiramukku, Manacaud.

 

                               (Party in person)                             

Opposite parties:

 

  1. Chairman and Managing Director, Kerala State Electricity Board Limited, Vydyuthi Bhavanam, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram-695 004.

 

  1. Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, National Payments Corporation of India, 1001 A, B Wing, 10th Floor, The Capital Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) Mumbai, Mumbai City. 

 

(By Advs. K.P. Jayaraj & Rabi George Mathews for OPs 1 & 2)

 

  1. Manager, State Bank of India, Capital Towers, No. 16/635 (2) P.O. District, Kalmandapam, Palakkad-678 013.

 

ORDER

SRI. P. V. JAYARAJAN:  PRESIDENT

          This complaint is filed under Sec. 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.  After hearing the matter this Commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties to appear before this Commission today.  When the case came up for consideration today, the complainant filed a memo stating that the matter is settled out of court and he has received the disputed amount from the opposite parties and hence he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.   

In the result, the complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will be no order as to cost. 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 27th day of July 2024.  

                        

              

              

              Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN                : PRESIDENT 

 

               Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR            : MEMBER  

 

             Sd/-

                                                      VIJU V.R                          : MEMBER

 

jb

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.