West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/886/2014

Station Manager, WBSEDCL - Complainant(s)

Versus

Md. Abdul Alam Mondal/ Alam Bari Mondal - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Srijan Nayek Nr. Alok Mukhopadhyay Ms. Arpita Saha

26 May 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. FA/886/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/08/2014 in Case No. EA/63/2014 of District North 24 Parganas DF, Barasat)
 
1. Station Manager, WBSEDCL
ES, Banipur, 2, Rail Gate, GT A.E/Jr.M, North 24 Pgs.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Md. Abdul Alam Mondal/ Alam Bari Mondal
S/o Md. Samser Ali Mondal, Vill. - Baluigachi, P.O. - Lakshmipul, P.S. Habra, Dist.- North 24 Pgs.
2. Abdul Hakim
S/o Late Golam Halder, Vill. - Baluigachi, P.O. - Lakshmipul, P.S. Habra, Dist.- North 24 Pgs.
3. Bablu Mondal
S/o Md. Samser Ali Mondal, Vill. - Baluigachi, P.O. - Lakshmipul, P.S. Habra, Dist.- North 24 Pgs.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DEBASIS BHATTACHARYA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JAGANNATH BAG MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Srijan Nayek Nr. Alok Mukhopadhyay Ms. Arpita Saha , Advocate
For the Respondent: A. B. Tarafder., Advocate
ORDER

Order No.5   date: 26-05-2015

Ld. Advocates for the Appellants and the Respondent No. 1 are present.  The appeal is taken up for hearing.

Ld. Advocate for the Appellant submits that at the very initial stage of the execution proceedings, WA against the Appellant has been made, which is bad in law, and also there is non-compliance of the order passed in the concerned C.C. No. 227/2012, as passed by the Ld. District Forum, 24 Parganas (N) by the Respondent No. 1/Complainant.  So, this order has been made without any application of mind and against the backdrop, when due formalities have not been duly complied with by the Respondent No. 1/Complainant himself as per the final order in the original case.  He also  makes out that to effect electric connection, free access is required as well as police help in case of disturbance by any obstructionists. So, this appeal.

Ld. Advocate for the Respondent No. 2, however, submits that there is no force and merit in the present appeal against the issuance of WA, as already the Appellant took bail in the execution case and the same is fixed for compliance by the Appellant.

As the Appellant has already appeared and surrendered before the Ld. District Forum in the execution case, there is nothing to agitate on this point in this appeal.  Only question remains is compliance of the order passed by the Ld. District Forum, 24 Parganas (N) in C.C. No. 227/2012, for which if the Appellant requires to take police help, there is no bar in it.  Accordingly, with such observation, the appeal is disposed of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. DEBASIS BHATTACHARYA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. JAGANNATH BAG]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.