QUORUM

President: Sh. Sanjay Garg

Member:Sh.T.S.Kamboj

C.C. No. 109 of 2011.

Date of Institution:21.02.2011

Date of Decision: 10.05.2011

Sukhdev Singh aged 44 years son of Dilawar Singh, resident of Village Sainia (Chak Khund Wala), Tehsil Jalalabad (W), District Ferozepur.

Complainant.

Versus

1. M.D. India Health Care Services (TPA) (Third Party Administrator under Bhai Ghanhaya Health Services Scheme), Maxpro Park-D/38 Industrial Area, Phase-1, Mohali through its authorized signatory,

2. ICICI Lombard Health Insurance Company Limited Quiet Officer, No. 10, Sec-40-B Chandigarh through its authorized signatory/S

3. The Chak SotrianCASS Limited, through its authorized signatory/Secretary, Tehsil Jalalabad District Ferozepur.

4. The Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Punjab, Ferozepur District Ferozepur.

5. Amrit Hospital, Court Road, Fazilka through its Dr. M.M. Singh.

Opposite parties.

C.C. No.109 of 2011//2//

Complaintunder Section 12of

the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

*******

PRESENT :

For the complainant /span>:Sh Sunil Kamboj Advocate

Forthe opposite party Nos.1 & 2 : Sh. J.S.Kamboj Advocate

For opposite party Nos. 3& 4 :Sh R.K.Sachdeva Advocate

For opposite party No.5 :Sh Hardeep Bajaj Advocate

/span>

ORDER

SANJAY GARG, PRESIDENT:-

As per averments, the brief facts of the complaint are that Sukhdev Singh complainant was insured under Bhai Ghanhya Sehat Sewa Scheme . During the subsistence of the policy, he took treatment from opposite party No.5 and spent Rs.25,500/- for his treatment. But the opposite parties refused to reimburse the same to the complainant. Hence this complaint.

2. Notice of the complaint was issued to the opposite parties who appeared through their counsel and filed separate written replies to the complaint and contested the complaint on the various grounds.

3. There were chances of compromise and the case was put up before the Lok Adalat. On persuasion, parties agreed for a compromise.

4. Sh J.S.Kamboj Advocate counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 has made a statement that the opposite party Nos.1 & 2 are ready to settle the

C.C. No.109 of 2011//3//

claim of the complainant within thirty days from today subject to providing discharge summary of treatment by the complainant to the counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2.

5.The counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he has heard the statement of Sh J.S.Kamboj advocate counsel for O.P.Nos. 1 & 2 and he accepts the offer of opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 on behalf of the complainant. The discharge summary pertaining to the complainant will be supplied to the counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 today itself. The complaint of the complainant may be disposed off in view of the above said compromise.

/span>6.In view of the separately recorded statements of the parties, this complaint is disposed off with a direction that the complainant would provide the copy of the discharge summary to the counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 & 2 and thereafter the opposite party Nos. 1 & 2will settle the claim of the complainant within next thirty days fromthe date of supply of copy of discharge summary. Parties will be bound by their statements. File be consigned to the record room.

Announced(Sanjay Garg)

10.05.2011 President

(Tarlok Singh)/span> Member