West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/205/2020

Md. Kamaluddin - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mazhar Iqbal - Opp.Party(s)

Arpita Dey Pal

27 Nov 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/205/2020
( Date of Filing : 12 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Md. Kamaluddin
4/H/2/7, Convent Lane, P.S. Entally, Kolkata-700015.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mazhar Iqbal
15/H/17, Bibi Bagan Lane, P.S. Entally, Kolkata-700015.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Arpita Dey Pal, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 27 Nov 2020
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.  03    Date :  27.11.2020

 

            Perused the petition of complaint coupled with document annexed with the record.

            It appears from the said documents that complainant had booked a  residential flat measuring about 350 Sq. ft. more or less on the 3rd  floor of premises No. 5/H/2/1 Bibi Bagan Lane, P.S. Entally, Kolkata - 700015 at a consideration amount of Rs.1300/-  per Sq. ft. vide agreement dated 19.07.2014. It also appears that the complainant had paid a sum mof Rs.3,00,000/-  by installments, last one being on 04.11.2015. According to the complainant the Developer did not handover the said flat nor refunded the paid amount even after making several settlement agreement dated 19.07.2017, 09.07.2018 and 12.10.2018.

 Fact remains that the complainant booked the said flat for tenancy purpose and is liable to pay Rs.4,55,000/- as consideration amount. In our opinion, the complainant is not a consumer Under Section–7 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 as there is relation between the parties as Landlord and Tenant.

            Having regard to the facts of the case disclosed in the consumer complaint, we are of the view that the complainant is not a consumer under the definition of Section-7 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Thus, the consumer complainant is not admitted and liable to be dismissed.

            Hence,

ORDERED

That the consumer complaint is not admitted and dismissed as the complainant is not a consumer.  

Liberty be given to the complainant to file afresh before the appropriate court of law, if so desired and if not otherwise barred by law.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.