Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/15/2014

Prem Chand - Complainant(s)

Versus

Max Life Insurance co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Harsh Manocha Adv.

15 Jan 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/15/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )
 
1. Prem Chand
Chd.
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

                                                         

First Appeal No.

:

15 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

10.01.2014

Date of Decision

 

15/01/2014

 

Prem

……Appellant/complainant

V e r s u s

1.Max Life Insurance Company Limited, SCO 36-37-38, 1st/2nd

2. Max Life Insurance Company Limited, Operation Centre, 90-A, Udyog Vihar, Sector 18, Gurgaon 122015 (Haryana)

 

Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:  

               

 

Argued by:

 

PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT

             

2.           

3.           

4.           

5.           

6.            

7.           

8.            

9.           

10.        

11.        th  he applied for cancellation of the Policy, on 28.08.2012, or that the reminders, referred to above, were sent by him, to the Opposite Parties. The letter dated 06.02.2013 (at page No.9 of the complainant’s documents) shows that the complainant himself informed the Opposite Parties that it was very unfortunate that the Agent had delivered above document (Policy No.871634440) on 24.01.2013, and it seemed that it was not forwarded to him (Chairman, Max Life Insurance Co. Ltd.) on 28.08.2012, through Local Office. He enclosed the Policy document, with his letter dated 06.02.2013. Since, the complainant sent the Policy document, vide letter dated 06.02.2013, to the Opposite Parties, the question of his sending the same, to them (Opposite Parties), vide letter dated 28.08.2012, did not at all arise. This factum also clearly disproves the contention of the complainant that he sent the Policy document, alongwith letter dated 28.08.2012, i.e. within the free-look period of 15 days, for cancellation of the same. Since, for the first time, the complainant sent request on 06.02.2013, for cancellation of the Policy, by sending the Policy document, the same (request) was certainly beyond 15 days of free-look period. Under these circumstances, the Opposite Parties were right, in declining the request of the complainant, for cancelling the Policy, in question, vide letter dated 26.02.2013. The Opposite Parties, by declining the request of the complainant, for the reasons, referred to above, therefore, were neither deficient, in rendering service, nor indulged into unfair trade practice.

12.        

13.        

14.        

15.        

16.        

Pronounced.

January 15, 2014

Sd/-

[JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

Sd/-

(DEV RAJ)

MEMBER

 

 

 

Rg

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.