Haryana

StateCommission

CC/89/2019

RISHIKA GUPTA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MAX BUPA HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

BALDEV SINGH

30 Aug 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

Complaint Case No.89 of 2019

                   Date of Institution:28.03.2019

          Date of Decision:30.08.2019

 

1.      Rishika Gupta (Minor) d/o Sh. Sachin Gupta through Sh. Sachin Gupta father and legal guardian of the complainant, resident of DK-29 Ward No.11, Old Anaj Mandi, Tauru, Opposite Radha Krishan Mandir, Tauru, Mewat, Rewari, Haryana-122105.

2.      Sachin Gupta son of Late Shri Mahender Kumar Gupta of DK-29, Ward No.11, Old Anaj Mandi, Tauru, Opposite Radha Krishan Mandir, Tauru, Mewat, Rewari, Haryana-122105.

…Complainants

Versus

 

1.      The Manager/M.D. cum C.E.O, Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd., 102, 1^st Floor, Vipul Agora, M.G. Road, Near Sahara Mall, Gurugram-122001.

2.      Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd., Corporate Office at Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044.

…Opposite Parties.

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S Mann.

                   Mrs. Manjula, Member.

 

Present:-    Shri Yogender Singh, counsel for the applicant-complainant.

Shri S.C. Thathai, counsel for the opposite parties No.1 & 2.

                   O R D E R

T.P.S. MANN J. (ORAL)

 

                   The complainants have filed the instant complaint wherein, they have sought the following relief:-

i)        To pay an amount of Rs.28,79,758/- along with interest @ 18% to be calculated from 17.11.2018 till its realization.

ii)       To pay compensation amount of Rs. Two Lakhs as a mental agony and harassment caused by the Opposite Party to the complainant.

iii)      To pay the cost of litigation and counsel fees for an amount of Rs.50,000/-.

iv)      Any other relief the Hon’ble Commission may deems fit may please be granted in favour of the complainant against the respondent. 

                   Opposite parties No.1 & 2 have put in appearance. However, notice issued to opposite party No.3 has not been received back.

                   Learned counsel for the applicant-complainant states that the opposite parties No.1 & 2 have already satisfied the claim of the complainant and thereafter, he may be allowed to withdraw the present complaint.

                   The complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

30^th August, 2019                Manjula                                             T.P. S. Mann

                                                Member                                             President

 

R.K