Haryana

Jind

CC/74/2020

Vikas Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Max Bupa Health Insurance Company Ltd. etc. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Prem Dubal

24 Nov 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ,JIND
MINI SECRETARIAT JIND-126102
 
Complaint Case No. CC/74/2020
( Date of Filing : 29 Jan 2020 )
 
1. Vikas Kumar
R/O 303/13 New Basti Rohtak Road Jind
Jind
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Max Bupa Health Insurance Company Ltd. etc.
Okhla New Delhi
New Delhi
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.K.SARDANA PRESIDENT
  SMT. NEERU AGGARWAL MEMBER
  MR.GURU DATT GOYAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None on behalf of complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Sh. Yogesh Yadav, Adv. counsel for OP No.1.
None on behalf of OP No.2.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 24 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Complaint Case No.74 of 2020

 

                        Vikas Kumar Vs. Max Bupa Health Ins. Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Present:       None on behalf of complainant.

Sh. Yogesh Yadav, Adv. counsel for OP No.1.

None on behalf of OP No.2.

 

Today the present complaint is fixed for tendering correct address of OP No.2 by the complainant but neither complainant nor his counsel nor his any representative appeared before the Commission till 12.50 P.M. inspite of repeated calls. However in the interest of justice, the file be put up after lunch break.

Member                      Member                            President

                                                                                          DCDRC/Jind

                                                                                          24.11.2022

 

                   Case called after lunch break. It is 3.50 P.M. but none bothered to appear before the Commission on behalf of complainant. On perusal of file, it has come into notice of this Commission that on the last date of hearing i.e. 17.11.2022, none appeared on behalf of complainant and in the interest of justice, one last opportunity was afforded to complainant to tender correct address of OP No.2 alongwith amended title for today. Further, on perusal of file, it has come into notice of this Commission that correct address of OP No.2 is not being filed by complainant for the last one year i.e. since 01.12.2021, wherefrom it is presumed that complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. As such, we have no option except to dismiss the present complaint for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties to complaint as per rules. File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.K.SARDANA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SMT. NEERU AGGARWAL]
MEMBER
 
 
[ MR.GURU DATT GOYAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.