West Bengal

South 24 Parganas

CC/31/2016

Gurupada Das, C/O Anukul Das. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Matiur Rahaman Laskar Pro-AIHE,C/O Abdur Rahaman Laskar. - Opp.Party(s)

30 Aug 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
South 24 Parganas
Baruipur , Kolkata - 700 144.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/31/2016
 
1. Gurupada Das, C/O Anukul Das.
Village- East Tentulberia, P.O. Panchpota, P.S.- Sonarpur, Dist. South 24- Parganas, Kolkata- 152.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Matiur Rahaman Laskar Pro-AIHE,C/O Abdur Rahaman Laskar.
P.O. P.S. Vill- Basanti, Dist. South 24- Parganas, Pin- 743312.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. UDAYAN MUKHOPADHYAY PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SHARMI BASU MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 30 Aug 2016
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

SOUTH 24 – PARGANAS , AMANTRAN BAZAR, BARUIPUR, KOLKATA-700 0144

 

      C.C. CASE NO. _31_ OF ___2016_

 

DATE OF FILING :4.4.2016                        DATE OF PASSING JUDGEMENT:  30/08/2016

 

Present                        :   President       :   Udayan Mukhopadhyay

 

                                        Member(s)    :    Mrs. Sharmi Basu 

                                                                             

COMPLAINANT        :    Gurupada Das,c/o Anukul Das of Vill-East Tentulberia, P.O Panchpota, P.S. Sonarpur, Dist. South 24-Parganas, Kolkata – 152.

 

  • VERSUS  -

 

O.P/O.Ps                            :   Matiur Rahaman Laskar, Prop. AIHE, C/o Abdul Rahaman Laskar, Vill.+ P.O + P.S- Basanti, Dist. South 24-Parganas, Pin- 743312.

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

                                                            J  U  D  G  E  M  E  N  T

 

Udayan Mukhopadhyay, President

This is an application under section 12 of the C.P Act, 1986  filed by the complainant on an allegation that he has paid Rs.55000/-  for B-Ed course to the O.P on an assurance that O.P will arrange for B.Ed court through Nagarjuna University of Andhra Pradesh (OMEGA) and also in order to convince the complainant O.P submitted one confirmation letter. The O.P also told them to purchase a ticket on 25th August, 2016 for appearance of B.Ed examination at Falaknama Express for appearance in the B.Ed examination . Accordingly complainant and other students also purchased the said ticket to arrive at Guntur and arrange a hotel for 5-6 days stay and later complainant came to learn that all the assurance was totally false and after visiting the said college and university  that O.P never took any admission of the complainant and others in the said university. Thereafter, complainant became very shocked and returned home with a broken heart. Complainant has further stated that he has contacted the O.Ps on 7.9.2015 and at that time his parents was assured to refund money along with extra Rs.2000/- but the O.P refunded first installment but thereafter did not contact. When the complainan5t went to collect the second installment in the house of the O.P, they were ousted from the house. The matter was informed to the Secretary , Kreta Surakha Mela and according to their advice this complainant is lodged. Complainant claims total Rs.99000/- including fees, travelling expenses, food and lodging etc.

Summon was served but none appears on behalf of the O.P , that is why, the case is taken up  in exparte hearing.

Points for decision in this case is whether there is any deficiency in service or unfair trade practice adopted by the O.P or not.

                                                            Decision with reasons

We have perused all the documents lying in the case record, money receipts , fees etc. and we find that O.P collected the money due to unfair trade practice which should be stopped ,for which we find that this is a glaring example of unfair trade practice taking the life of a student and it should be mentioned here that O.P is not an educational institution and he assured the complainant for his admission in an educational institution and collected money through installment from time to time. This is an unfair trade practice for which this case is highly maintainable and we find that complainant should get relief from this relief oriented bench of Consumer Court , South 24-Parganas, otherwise tears of the complainant cannot be meted out and alternatively this type of unruly O.P will be encouraged by the order of the judicial proceedings ,if we dismiss the case. So, question of dismissal of the case does not arise  since the O.P is not an educational institution and he has squeezed money with an assurance for admission in an educational institution situated at Andhra Pradesh and he has not stopped there and also assured the complainant and other students to purchase tickets at Falaknama Express for their examination for B.Ed Court but ultimately after taking shelter at Guntur Andhra Pradesh complainant came to learn that all these things are fake which is unfair trade practice.

Accordingly, it is

                                                            Ordered

That the  case  is allowed in exparte against the O.P.

The O.P is hereby directed to refund Rs.29,500/- along with interest @15% p.a 22.9.2015 to till its realization within 30 days from the date of this order.

O.P is also directed to pay compensation of Rs.20,000/- and litigation cost Rs.5000/- to the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order failing which, damage per day Rs.100/- will be started from the date of default till its realization and the said amount will be deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account.

Complainant is at liberty to execute the order through this Bench after expiry of the stipulated period.

Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the complainant free of cost and one copy be sent to the O.P through speed post.

 

                                                Member                                                                       President

 

Dictated and corrected by me

                               

 

                        President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The judgment in separate sheet is ready and is delivered in open Forum. As it is ,

 

                       

Ordered

That the  case  is allowed in exparte against the O.P.

The O.P is hereby directed to refund Rs.29,500/- along with interest @15% p.a 22.9.2015 to till its realization within 30 days from the date of this order.

O.P is also directed to pay compensation of Rs.20,000/- and litigation cost Rs.5000/- to the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order failing which, damage per day Rs.100/- will be started from the date of default till its realization and the said amount will be deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account.

Complainant is at liberty to execute the order through this Bench after expiry of the stipulated period.

Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the complainant free of cost and one copy be sent to the O.P through speed post.

 

                                                Member                                                                       President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. UDAYAN MUKHOPADHYAY]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SHARMI BASU]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.