Kerala

StateCommission

RP/85/2023

NIPPON TOYOTA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MATHEW JOSEPH - Opp.Party(s)

M/S P VISWANATHAN ASSOCIATES

13 Nov 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Revision Petition No. RP/85/2023
( Date of Filing : 25 Oct 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/08/2023 in Case No. CC/31/2023 of District Ernakulam)
 
1. NIPPON TOYOTA
X/314K N H BYEPASS NETTOOR P O KOCHI 682040
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MATHEW JOSEPH
VETTICAPPALLIL HOUSE PALLIPURATHUSSERY P O VAIKOM KOTTAYAM 686606
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 Nov 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

REVISION PETITION No. 85/2023

ORDER DATED: 13.11.2023

(Against the Order in I.A. 542/2023 in C.C. 31/2023 of CDRC, Ernakulam)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D.                                                    : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

REVISION PETITIONER:

 

Nippon Toyota, X/314K, NH Byepass, Nettoor P.O., Kochi-682 040, represented by its Service Manager, Ajesh V. Kartha, Puthuppara House, Vengola P.O., Arackappady, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam-683 556.

 

(By Advs. M/s P. Viswanathan Associates)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENT:

 

Mathew Joseph, Vetticappallil House, Pallipurathussery P.O., Vaikom, Kottayam-686 606.

                  

ORDER

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

Heard the counsel for the revision petitioner.  We are satisfied that in the light of the directions issued by the Supreme Court in ARN Infrastructure India Ltd. Vs. Hara Prasad Ghosh dated 04.09.2023 (2023 Live Law (SC) 763 it shall be sufficient that this revision petition is disposed of without admitting the same clarifying that the petitioner herein shall be entitled to be heard by the District Commission, even though no version was filed in the Consumer Complaint that is pending.  This revision is disposed of with a direction to the District Commission to afford a hearing to the revision petitioner in terms of the dictum in the decision of the Supreme Court referred to above.

 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                                 AJITH KUMAR D.: JUDICIAL MEMBER

                                                                       

                                                                                          RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER

jb

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.