Delhi

West Delhi

CC/05/320

ARVIND GUPTA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MARUTI UDYOG - Opp.Party(s)

18 Oct 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III,

WEST DISTRICT, C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,

NEW DELHI

 

CC No.320/2005

 

Arvind Gupta

S/o Shri Nityanand Gupta,

R/o 107-C, Pocket GH-2,

Ankur Apartments,

New Delhi-110087

 

                                                                                                               ………..Complainant

VERSUS

Maruti Udyog Ltd,

11^th Floor, Jeevan Prakash,

25, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,

New Delhi-110001

 

M/s Vikas Motors Ltd,

34, Rama Road,

New Delhi-110015

 

M/s Auto Vikas Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd,

12A, Shivaji Marg,

Near Haldiram’s , New Delhi-110015                         

 

                                                                                                               .........Opposite Parties

 

CORAM:

Ms. Sonica Mehrotra, President

Ms. Richa Jindal, Member

Mr. Anil Kumar Koushal, Member

Present: None                                                                                                       18.10.2022

              

 

            During the course of hearing on the last date of hearing on 02.02.2022, a specific query was put to  counsel for the complainant as to where is the subject vehicle,  to which counsel for the complainant  submitted that to the best of his knowledge, the vehicle has been disposed off

                                                                                                               

 to a third party.  He sought time to seek instructions from the complainant on this aspect.  Thereafter the complainant has not appeared before us till date nor any information as to the status of the vehicle has been filed on record.  

Since the  complainant has not been appearing in this  case, the statement of counsel for the complainant made on the last date of hearing is presumed to be true. In view of the above revelation/admission on the part of the complainant, no cause of action survives in the complaint. We may  here refer to the  judgment   of the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in the case of M/S. Honda Cars India Ltd. vs Jatinder Singh Madan, (Revision Petition NO.2622/2012, decided on 11 October, 2013) wherein  it was held that since the complainant has sold the vehicle, the complaint is rendered infructuous as the complainant is no more a consumer. 

In view of the aforementioned ruling, the complaint is dismissed as infructuous. File be consigned to record room.

 

 (Richa Jindal)                           (Anil Kumar Koushal)                                            (Sonica Mehrotra)

    Member                                       Member                                                    President