Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/43/2018

C A Duraimanickam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, & others - Opp.Party(s)

P V Balasubramaniam

25 Apr 2018

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 05.01.2018                                                                                                                                                Date of Order  : 25.04.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPTUES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L,              : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K. AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.                           :  MEMBER-I

   

C.C. NO.43/2018

WEDNESDAY THE 25^TH DAY OF APRIL 2018

Mr. C.A. Duraimanickam,

S/o. (Late) Shri. C.A. Fernando,

No.9, Bobbili Raja Salai,

K.K. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 078.                                              .. Complainant

                                                          ..Versus..       

1. Maruti Suzuki India Limited,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No.1, Nelson Mandela Road,

Vasant Kunj,

New Delhi – 110 070.

 

2. Khivraj Motors Private Limited,

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,

No.7, 1^st Avenue, Shastri Nagar,

Adyar,

Chennai – 600 020.

 

3. Mr. Sampath Kumar,

Manager – Customer Care,

Khivraj Motors Private Limited,

No.7, 1^st Avenue,

Shastri Nagar,

Adyar,

Chennai – 600 020.                                            .. Opposite parties.

  

Counsel for the complainant                  :  M/s. P.V. Balasubramaniam &

                                                                    others

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 3 :  M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co.

                                                ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking to replace the defective Maruthi Brezza Car bearing No.TN 09 CK 0950 with brand new one and to take care of the registration, insurance and miscellaneous expenses towards the new car, to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for loss, hardship, mental agony, trauma, stress physical strain, pain, pressure caused to the complainant and to pay the cost.

Vakalath of 1^st opposite party filed.  Both complainant and 1^st opposite party appeared in person and filed Joint Compromise Memorandum of Understanding, the contents of which are self explanatory and is recorded.  In view of the Compromise Memorandum of Understanding, this case is dismissed as settled out of Court.  Memorandum of understanding form part of the order.

 

MEMBER –I                                                                       PRESIDENT