Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/18/243

ANTONY BIJU P J - Complainant(s)

Versus

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD - Opp.Party(s)

LEEMA ROSY

17 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/18/243
( Date of Filing : 06 Jun 2018 )
 
1. ANTONY BIJU P J
POOPANA H PALLURUTHY ESI RD KOCHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD
REP BY TERRITORY SERVICE MANAGER,REGIONAL OFFICE AT 2ND FLR TUTUS TOWER NH 47 PADIVATTOM KOCHI-24
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, ERNAKULAM

Date of filing : 06/06/2018

Date of order : 17/09/2022

PRESENT:

Shri.D.B.Binu President

Shri.V.Ramachandran Member

Smt. Sreevidhia T.N Member

CC.No.243/2018

Between

COMPLAINANT

Antony Biju P.J., S/o.P.X.Joseph, Residing at Poopana House, Palluruthy, ESI Road, Kochi-682 006

 

(By Adv.Leema Rosy D., M/s.Sajan & Leema, Naduvilaveettil, St.Joseph’s Chapel Road, Parry Junction, Kochi-682 006)

Vs.

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1) Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Represented by its Territory Service Manager, having its regional office at 2nd Floor, Tutus Tower, NH-47 Byepass, Padivattom, Kochi-682 024.

(O.p1 rep. by Adv.Anto Thomas, ‘Associate of Justice’, Cochin Law Associates, Door No.40/243 A, 1st Floor, Justice Chandrasekaramenon Road, (formerly Layam Road), Ernakulam-682 011)

2) Indus Motor Co. Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its General Manager, Indus Motor Co.Pvt. Ltd., M.G.Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 015

 

3) Zonal Service Head of Indus Motor Co.Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Zonal Service Head Manager, Indus Motor Co.Pvt. Ltd., City Workshop, M.G.Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 015.

(o.p2 and 3 rep. by Adv.P.K.Aboobacker, Near Kombara Masjid, Komara Junction, Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-16)

 

O R D E R

 

D.B.Binu, President

 

 

 

The complainant is absent. No representation. The 2nd and 3 opposite paties are represented. The case was posted for evidence of the complainant listed to 07.05. 2021. The opposite parties filed their version in 2018 itself. So many chances were given to the complainant for adducing his evidence. Today the case is posted for the evidence of the complainant as a last chance. The complainant was absent and no representation from his side. After filing this case, the complainant appeared before this commission on two postings that is on 10.07.2018 and 30.12.2019. The complainant remained absent and did not file an affidavit or adduce any evidence so far.

Hence the case is dismissed for want of evidence.

 

 

Hence the case is dismissed as 'default' of the complainant.

 

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the 17 day of September 2022.

 

Sd/-D.B.Binu, President

Sd/-V.Ramachandran, Member

Sd/-Sreevidhia T.N., Member

 

Forwarded by Order

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.