Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/182/2017

Sunil Gangadhar Menon, Rep by POA, Anil Gangadhar Menon & anr - Complainant(s)

Versus

Marg Properties, Rep by its Managing Director & anr - Opp.Party(s)

06 Apr 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.182/2017

DATED THE 06^TH DAY OF APRIL 2023

1. Mr. Sunil Gangadhar Menon,

S/o. Mr. K.G. Menon,

A-13, Ashwin Building,

Marve Road,

Malad (W),

Mumbai.

 

2. Mrs. Bindu  Sunil Menon,

W/o. Mr. Sunil Gangadhar Menon,

A-13, Ashwin Building,

Marve Road,

Malad (W),

Mumbai.

 

Both the complainants are represented by their

Power Agent / Authorized Signatory,

Mr. Anil Gangadhar Menon,

S/o. Mr. K.G. Menon,

A4, 3^rd Floor, Villa Thyagaraja,

6^th Cross, Anna Nagar,

Pondicherry – 605 005.                                                                             .. Complainants.                                                   

- Versus –

1. Marg Properties,

Represented by its Managing Director,

“Marg Axis”, No.4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Kottivakkam,

Chennai – 600 041.     

 

2. New Chennai Township Pvt. Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director,

Regd. Office: “Marg Axis”, No.4/318,

Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Kottivakkam,

Chennai – 600 041.

 

Corporate Office:

New Chennai Township Pvt. Ltd.,

MARG Pancham, Block B,

No.334, Futura Tech Park,

Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Sholinganallur,

Chennai – 600 119.                                                                  .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainants                      : M/s. R. Anish Kumar

Counsel for the opposite parties                  : M/s. J. Poongodi

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 06.04.2023 for pronouncing orders and both the parties have appeared before this Commission with Joint Memo  and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

Both present.

 

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, a Joint Memo has been filed by the Counsel appearing for the respective parties stating that amicable settlement has been entered between the parties out of this Commission.   Further, it has been stated in the Joint Memo that ‘the opposite party has settled the entire payment and the same was acknowledged by the complainant and they have no claims each other’.

 

Recording the Joint Memo, this Consumer Complaint is disposed off.  The Joint Memo shall form part of the order.   No costs.

 

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT