Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/8/2015

Mr.Daniel Bahkayaraj Jayakaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

Marg Properties, Rep by its Autharised Representation, New Chennai Township Pvt Ltd, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.S.V.Parvin Rathinam

25 Oct 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/8/2015
( Date of Filing : 23 Jan 2015 )
 
1. Mr.Daniel Bahkayaraj Jayakaran
No.38, Lakshmi Nagar, Adambakkam, Chennai-600088
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Marg Properties, Rep by its Autharised Representation, New Chennai Township Pvt Ltd,
Marg Axis, 4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam, Chennai-600041.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

                    BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                             Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.8/2015

                                                               DATED THE 25TH  DAY OF OCTOBER  2021

 

Mr. Daniel Bahkayaraj Jayakaran

No.38, Lakshmi Nagar, Adambakkam

Chennai – 600 088.

 

                                                                                                  .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. Marg Properties

    Rep. by its Authorised Representation

    New Chennai Township Private Limited,

    Marg Axis, 4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam,

    Chennai – 600 041.

 

2. The Managing Director,

   Marg Properties,

   New Chennai Township Private Limited,

   Marg Axis, 4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam,

   Chennai – 600 041.

.                                                                              .. Opposite Parties.

 

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. S.V. Praveen Rathinam

 Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2    : M/s. B.R. Sankaralingam

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 25.10.2021 for hearing. Due to non-representation of the complainant, this Commission made the following order

                                                                              Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant. ops 1 and 2 present. Today this matter is posted for appearance of both and for arguments. When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for the complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.45 noon, the complainant was again not present.  Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                   Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.