Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/269/2014

Lawarance Gunasekar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Marg Properties Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Dr.G.Krishnamurthy

24 Feb 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/269/2014
 
1. Lawarance Gunasekar
Adyar Chn-20.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Marg Properties Ltd.,
Kottivakam Chn -41.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   30.01.2014

                                                                        Date of Order :   24.02.2016.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.269/2014

WEDNESDAY THIS  24TH  DAY OF FEBRUARY  2016

 

1.  Lawarance Gunasekar,

S/o. Mariavyakulam,

 

2. L.Pani Lalitha,

W/o. Lawarance Gunasekar,

 

Both are residing at

No.14, Ramasamy Garden,

Adyar, Chennai 600 020.                                      ..Complainant

                                            ..Vs..

 

1. Marg Properties Ltd.,

Rep. by its

Managing Director & Chairman,

No.4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Kottivakkam,

Chennai 600 041.

 

2. Marg Properties Ltd.,

Rep. by its

Senior Manager-Customer Service,

NO.4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Kottivakkam,

Chennai 600 041.

 

3. New Chennai Township (P) Ltd.,

Rep. by its,

AGM – Customer Service,

Futura Tech Park,

No.334, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,

Sholinganallur,

Chennai 600 119.                                                ..Opposite parties.

 

For the Complainant                    :   M/s. Dr.G.Krishnamurthy & other        

For the Opposite parties               :   M/s. B.R.Shankaralingam & others    

 

 

          Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite parties  to refund the deposit amount of Rs.4,49,665/- and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation and cost of the complaint to the complainant. 

     ORDER

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

 

          No  representation for complainant, complainant not filed proof affidavit inspite of several adjournments, complainant called absent, this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 

 

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.