BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD
F.A.No.89 OF 2012 AGAINST C.C.NO.212 OF 2009 DISTRICT FORUM GUNTUR
Between:
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
Rep. by its Branch Manager
Office at near Water Tanks,
6/13,
Appellant/ opposite party
Mannava rep. by her power of Attorney Holder and Husband
Respondents/ opposite parties
Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondents
QUORUM:
1. `4
2.
3. `2`2
4.
5.
6. `1,66,670/- as compensation and interest thereon. It is contended that the insurance company would indemnify the insured to the extent of actual loss caused to the insured stock and not for the stock which has not been damaged in the accident.
7.
8.
9. `40
10.
i) 387.4 quintals of stock was damaged and stocks stored in 232 boras were partly damaged.
ii) The surveyor had not mentioned in his report about the quantity of
11.
“Apart from these heaps, 1) operations.
a) Kappas b) Kappas c) Kappas, 20% d) GoodTotal 12.
10.0 ASSESMENT OF LOSS
Value of 75.40Value of 46.50Value of 135.5 ‘ Add: Salvage/Segregation Expenses (L.S.) Less : Net Liability assessed
13.
8.
14. `4`1`4,00,000/-. As such the order of the District Forum insofar awarding of the sum of`1
15. `10,000/- towards compensation and`1,000/- towards costs. The parties shall bear their own costs.
KMK*
